f03100006
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
302.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.37%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
71935
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.25 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
302.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.37%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
71935
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
266.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.6%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
70815
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
511.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.76%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
147234
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
909.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
19.15%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
214750
Total Claims
96%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mountain View, California, US
565.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.91%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
141589
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN
338.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.12%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
89316
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN
492.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.38%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
145164
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mountain View, California, US
564.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.88%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
103236
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mountain View, California, US
502.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.58%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
123330
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
São Paulo, São Paulo, BR
296.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.24%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
60417
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 239.59 TiB | 1.17 PiB | 25.22% |
| 10 | 31.09 TiB | 310.94 TiB | 6.54% |
| 8 | 26.19 TiB | 209.5 TiB | 4.41% |
| 7 | 193.72 TiB | 1.32 PiB | 28.54% |
| 1 | 5 TiB | 5 TiB | 0.1% |
| 2 | 60.03 TiB | 120.06 TiB | 2.52% |
| 9 | 34.56 TiB | 311.06 TiB | 6.54% |
| 4 | 91.75 TiB | 367 TiB | 7.72% |
| 6 | 52.06 TiB | 312.38 TiB | 6.57% |
| 3 | 186.63 TiB | 559.88 TiB | 11.78% |
| 920.63 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||