DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 160836

Client ID: f03623205

Report Detail
Report 160836 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.33 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
3 issues
Number of providers: 11

f03081952

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

366.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.29%

Deal Percentage

0.19% / 704 GiB

Duplication

163759

Total Claims

99%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03081960

Los Angeles, California, US

115.47 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.24%

Deal Percentage

0.08% / 96 GiB

Duplication

65956

Total Claims

99%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03373337

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

340.47 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.56%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 32 GiB

Duplication

315015

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03373373

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

342.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.62%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

302337

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03373733

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

341.66 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.59%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

303432

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03377773

Lim, Bac Ninh, VN

338.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.52%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 32 GiB

Duplication

305297

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03377778

Lim, Bac Ninh, VN

342.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.63%

Deal Percentage

0.02% / 64 GiB

Duplication

303748

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03567898

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

282.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.93%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

118320

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03567899

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

402.38 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.3%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

128744

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03577777

Singapore, Singapore, SG

400.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.26%

Deal Percentage

0.12% / 512 GiB

Duplication

127926

Total Claims

99%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03577778

Singapore, Singapore, SG

286.72 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.05%

Deal Percentage

0.25% / 736 GiB

Duplication

126281

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
1
24.94 TiB
24.94 TiB
0.7%
9
80.47 TiB
724.34 TiB
20.34%
8
13.25 TiB
106 TiB
2.97%
4
25.63 TiB
102.84 TiB
2.88%
6
64 GiB
384 GiB
0.01%
10
246.94 TiB
2.41 PiB
69.38%
2
1.25 TiB
2.5 TiB
0.07%
3
35.94 TiB
107.84 TiB
3.02%
7
3.03 TiB
21.22 TiB
0.59%
431.5 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.