f02825281
Ürümqi, Xinjiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
329.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.47%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
97099
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
0.89 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Ürümqi, Xinjiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
329.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.47%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
97099
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
328.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.46%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
97277
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ürümqi, Xinjiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
329.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.48%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
98003
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
329.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.47%
Deal Percentage
0.05% / 160 GiB
Duplication
99146
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
200 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.32%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
41069
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
London, England, GB
Sample Piece URL not found
828.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
13.76%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
92329
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Jakarta, Jakarta, ID
Sample Piece URL not found
399.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.64%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
76601
Total Claims
5%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Jakarta, Jakarta, ID
399.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.63%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
106214
Total Claims
28%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
105.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.75%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
41719
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Manila, National Capital Region, PH
Sample Piece URL not found
538.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.94%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
211631
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Manila, National Capital Region, PH
Sample Piece URL not found
534.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.88%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
211799
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
539.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.96%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
222412
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
60.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.01%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
73834
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
326.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.42%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
112669
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
316.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.25%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
109492
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chongqing, Chongqing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
455.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.56%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 160 GiB
Duplication
32033
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 13.66 TiB | 68.28 TiB | 1.13% |
| 6 | 248.31 TiB | 1.45 PiB | 24.73% |
| 2 | 29.19 TiB | 58.41 TiB | 0.96% |
| 8 | 140 TiB | 1.09 PiB | 18.59% |
| 1 | 581.03 TiB | 581.06 TiB | 9.64% |
| 4 | 2.03 TiB | 8.13 TiB | 0.13% |
| 7 | 317.72 TiB | 2.17 PiB | 36.92% |
| 3 | 157.81 TiB | 473.44 TiB | 7.85% |
| 1.45 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||