DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 198528

Client ID: f03246431

Report Detail
Report 198528 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.43 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
5 issues
Number of providers: 10

f02003699

Moscow, Moscow, RU

Sample Piece URL not found

70.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.03%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

163863

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03027241

New York City, New York, US

Sample Piece URL not found

297.53 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.33%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

221008

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03087446

Los Angeles, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

531.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.73%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

172976

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03136895

Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US

Sample Piece URL not found

959.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

13.95%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

197683

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03137648

New York City, New York, US

Sample Piece URL not found

443.22 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.44%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

151150

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03157902

Los Angeles, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

1.23 PiB

Total Deal Size

18.26%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

110962

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03161261

New York City, New York, US

Sample Piece URL not found

444.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.46%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

153786

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03187925

Los Angeles, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

1.66 PiB

Total Deal Size

24.77%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

155310

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03224648

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

211.53 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.08%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

88573

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03224828

London, England, GB

Sample Piece URL not found

959.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

13.95%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

76582

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
8
82.81 TiB
662.5 TiB
9.63%
4
394.19 TiB
1.54 PiB
22.92%
1
500.94 TiB
500.94 TiB
7.28%
3
36.03 TiB
108.09 TiB
1.57%
5
87.56 TiB
437.81 TiB
6.36%
7
135.34 TiB
947.41 TiB
13.77%
6
15.81 TiB
94.88 TiB
1.37%
2
328.13 TiB
656.25 TiB
9.54%
9
210.34 TiB
1.85 PiB
27.52%
1.75 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.