DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 176243

Client ID: f03246431

Report Detail
Report 176243 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.43 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
7 issues
Number of providers: 10

f02003699

Moscow, Moscow, RU

70.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.03%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

160101

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03027241

New York City, New York, US

Sample Piece URL not found

297.47 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.33%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

177191

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03087446

Los Angeles, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

531.19 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.73%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

172930

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03136895

Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US

Sample Piece URL not found

958.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

13.95%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

164045

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03137648

New York City, New York, US

Sample Piece URL not found

443.16 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.45%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

150347

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03157902

Los Angeles, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

1.23 PiB

Total Deal Size

18.27%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

110844

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03161261

New York City, New York, US

Sample Piece URL not found

443.53 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.45%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

152140

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03187925

Los Angeles, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

1.66 PiB

Total Deal Size

24.77%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

155181

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03224648

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

211.5 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.08%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

88351

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03224828

London, England, GB

Sample Piece URL not found

958.69 TiB

Total Deal Size

13.95%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

76529

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
8
83.59 TiB
668.75 TiB
9.72%
4
392.78 TiB
1.53 PiB
22.85%
1
501.56 TiB
501.56 TiB
7.29%
3
36.91 TiB
110.72 TiB
1.61%
5
87.66 TiB
438.28 TiB
6.37%
7
134.75 TiB
943.25 TiB
13.72%
6
16.44 TiB
98.63 TiB
1.43%
2
328.03 TiB
656.06 TiB
9.54%
9
209.44 TiB
1.84 PiB
27.42%
1.75 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.