DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 313891

Client ID: f03241198

Report Detail
Report 313891 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

1.56 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
6 issues
Number of providers: 10

f01084413

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

102.91 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.68%

Deal Percentage

3.13% / 3.22 TiB

Duplication

261713

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01975299

Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

77.5 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.03%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

27472

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02816097

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

248.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

16.15%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

83121

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02828242

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

176.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.48%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

97015

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100004

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

102.75 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.67%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

131520

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100009

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

80 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.19%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

302796

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03216485

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

80 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.19%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

112248

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03228358

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

203.47 TiB

Total Deal Size

13.2%

Deal Percentage

1.43% / 2.91 TiB

Duplication

119916

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03231666

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

147.72 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.58%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

130167

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03233966

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

320.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

20.82%

Deal Percentage

1.09% / 3.5 TiB

Duplication

81201

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
5
45.09 TiB
227.28 TiB
14.74%
1
147.19 TiB
147.5 TiB
9.57%
4
28.63 TiB
115.78 TiB
7.51%
6
4.91 TiB
29.91 TiB
1.94%
7
18.31 TiB
128.88 TiB
8.36%
2
49.25 TiB
99.25 TiB
6.43%
8
3.84 TiB
30.81 TiB
1.99%
9
76.5 TiB
692.13 TiB
44.9%
3
23 TiB
69.63 TiB
4.51%
396.72 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.