Commoncrawl

Client ID: f03138382

Report Detail
Report 2968 from 2024-12-18 03:03

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
2 issues
Number of providers: 12
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate (via HTTP)
f01907578
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
84.41 TiB
4.18%
0.00%
No
N/A
0.00%(0%)
f01928097
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
464.78 TiB
23.01%
0.00%
No
N/A
0.00%(0%)
f03067443
Ningbo, Zhejiang, CN
97.39 TiB
4.82%
0.00%
No
N/A
0.00%(0%)
f03072985
Portland, Oregon, US
241.41 TiB
11.95%
2.47%
No
N/A
0.00%(0%)
f03074583
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
3.13 TiB
0.15%
0.00%
No
N/A
0.00%(0%)
f03074586
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
3.03 TiB
0.15%
0.00%
No
N/A
0.00%(0%)
f03074587
Seoul, Seoul, KR
3.13 TiB
0.15%
0.00%
No
N/A
0.00%(0%)
f03074589
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
36.5 TiB
1.81%
0.00%
No
N/A
0.00%(0%)
f03074592
Los Angeles, California, US
19 TiB
0.94%
0.00%
No
N/A
0.00%(0%)
f03081864
Tri-Cities, Washington, US
251.06 TiB
12.43%
0.00%
No
N/A
0.00%(0%)
f03091739
Dallas, Texas, US
415.66 TiB
20.58%
4.87%
No
N/A
89.02%(0%)
f03144037
Paripark, Seoul, KR
400.16 TiB
19.81%
0.00%
No
N/A
91.36%(0%)

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
1.44 PiB
1.46 PiB
74.02%
2
251.94 TiB
509 TiB
25.2%
4
96 GiB
384 GiB
0.01%
5
3.03 TiB
15.16 TiB
0.75%
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.