f01907578
Xiamen, Fujian, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
168.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.59%
Deal Percentage
50% / 84.41 TiB
Duplication
26920
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
0.76 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Xiamen, Fujian, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
168.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.59%
Deal Percentage
50% / 84.41 TiB
Duplication
26920
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
923.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
36.04%
Deal Percentage
49.67% / 458.72 TiB
Duplication
86388
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
97.39 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.8%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
3306
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Portland, Oregon, US
Sample Piece URL not found
241.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.42%
Deal Percentage
2.47% / 5.97 TiB
Duplication
31125
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
3.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.12%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75026
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
3.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.12%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74995
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
3.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.12%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75017
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
36.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.42%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75455
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
19 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.74%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75297
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Portland, Oregon, US
Sample Piece URL not found
251.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.8%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
32699
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
415.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.22%
Deal Percentage
4.87% / 20.25 TiB
Duplication
56092
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
400.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.61%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
131157
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.44 PiB | 1.95 PiB | 78.1% |
| 5 | 3.03 TiB | 18.19 TiB | 0.7% |
| 4 | 96 GiB | 480 GiB | 0.01% |
| 2 | 251.94 TiB | 542.38 TiB | 21.16% |
| 1.69 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||