f02200472
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
50.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.51%
Deal Percentage
0.06% / 32 GiB
Duplication
18905
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
0.21 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
50.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.51%
Deal Percentage
0.06% / 32 GiB
Duplication
18905
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
185.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.18%
Deal Percentage
0.17% / 320 GiB
Duplication
132061
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
306.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.2%
Deal Percentage
49.04% / 150.34 TiB
Duplication
159304
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
306.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.17%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 96 GiB
Duplication
115972
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
135.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.72%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75026
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
149.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.39%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74995
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
149.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.39%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75017
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
56.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.82%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75455
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
103.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.13%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75297
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
574.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
28.5%
Deal Percentage
50.01% / 287.5 TiB
Duplication
138296
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 43 TiB | 299.88 TiB | 14.86% |
| 1 | 131.56 TiB | 132.16 TiB | 6.55% |
| 4 | 145.38 TiB | 781.88 TiB | 38.76% |
| 3 | 155.44 TiB | 526.47 TiB | 26.1% |
| 2 | 92.13 TiB | 276.53 TiB | 13.71% |
| 567.5 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||