Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

PrelingerArchives LLC

Client ID: f03091977

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

96.32 TiB

Allocated DataCap

370 TiB
Report Detail
Report 26160 from 2025-03-22 03:37

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 26
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
f01115949
Seoul, Seoul, KR
96 GiB
0.05%
0.00%
Not reporting
10823
79.29%
0.00%
f01227505
Seoul, Seoul, KR
128 GiB
0.06%
0.00%
Not reporting
64
0.00%
0.00%
f01770778
Seoul, Seoul, KR
544 GiB
0.27%
0.00%
Not reporting
11098
85.72%
0.00%
f0187709
Moscow, Moscow, RU
32 GiB
0.02%
0.00%
OK
9738
79.11%
0.00%
f01900525
Seoul, Seoul, KR
960 GiB
0.48%
0.00%
Not reporting
11867
20.75%
0.00%
f01924824
Seoul, Seoul, KR
288 GiB
0.14%
0.00%
Not reporting
13097
16.56%
0.00%
f01924891
Seoul, Seoul, KR
288 GiB
0.14%
0.00%
Not reporting
12787
17.49%
0.00%
f01926635
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
32 GiB
0.02%
0.00%
OK
150076
53.72%
0.00%
f01927163
Seoul, Seoul, KR
352 GiB
0.18%
0.00%
Not reporting
12469
26.91%
0.00%
f01982557
Seoul, Seoul, KR
128 GiB
0.06%
0.00%
Not reporting
604
0.00%
0.00%
f01987994
Seoul, Seoul, KR
544 GiB
0.27%
0.00%
Not reporting
650
7.33%
0.00%
f02011071
San Francisco, California, US
67.13 TiB
34.26%
2.00%
Not reporting
3287
0.00%
0.00%
f02259776
Klang, Selangor, MY
96 GiB
0.05%
0.00%
Not reporting
1077
62.20%
0.00%
f02639429
Sugar Land, Texas, US
78 TiB
39.81%
2.28%
Not reporting
5612
45.55%
0.00%
f02822919
Palmerston North, Manawatu-Wanganui, NZ
32 GiB
0.02%
0.00%
OK
1228
76.77%
0.00%
f02860778
Seoul, Seoul, KR
96 GiB
0.05%
0.00%
Not reporting
1139
0.00%
0.00%
f02860783
Seoul, Seoul, KR
128 GiB
0.06%
0.00%
Not reporting
728
0.00%
0.00%
f02941916
Seoul, Seoul, KR
224 GiB
0.11%
0.00%
Not reporting
546
0.00%
0.00%
f02943119
Okcheon, North Chungcheong, KR
192 GiB
0.10%
0.00%
Not reporting
1297
0.00%
0.00%
f03134685
Incheon, Incheon, KR
928 GiB
0.46%
0.00%
Not reporting
16248
53.83%
0.00%
f03277453
Petaling Jaya, Selangor, MY
64 GiB
0.03%
0.00%
OK
23105
2.68%
0.00%
f03383926
Seoul, Seoul, KR
416 GiB
0.21%
0.00%
Not reporting
86
0.00%
0.00%
f03468521
Lelystad, Flevoland, NL
44.25 TiB
22.58%
0.00%
OK
2824
0.00%
0.00%
f03493414
Lelystad, Flevoland, NL
736 GiB
0.37%
0.00%
OK
2098
0.00%
0.00%
f0717969
Huntington Park, California, US
64 GiB
0.03%
0.00%
Not reporting
35666
0.00%
0.00%
f0763337
San Diego, California, US
352 GiB
0.18%
0.00%
Not reporting
7601
4.24%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
2 issues
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
23.88 TiB
24.88 TiB
12.69%
2
35.22 TiB
71.38 TiB
36.42%
3
31.88 TiB
96.81 TiB
49.4%
4
352 GiB
1.38 TiB
0.7%
5
192 GiB
960 GiB
0.47%
6
96 GiB
576 GiB
0.28%
91.59 TiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
f01131298
96 GiB
2
f02208630
3.25 TiB
103