Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

PrelingerArchives LLC

Client ID: f03091977

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

96.32 TiB

Allocated DataCap

370 TiB
Report Detail
Report 25795 from 2025-03-21 03:38

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 26
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
f01115949
Seoul, Seoul, KR
96 GiB
0.05%
0.00%
Not reporting
10823
79.27%
0.00%
f01227505
Seoul, Seoul, KR
128 GiB
0.06%
0.00%
Not reporting
61
0.00%
0.00%
f01770778
Seoul, Seoul, KR
512 GiB
0.26%
0.00%
Not reporting
11097
84.93%
0.00%
f0187709
Moscow, Moscow, RU
32 GiB
0.02%
0.00%
OK
9733
79.37%
0.00%
f01900525
Seoul, Seoul, KR
896 GiB
0.45%
0.00%
Not reporting
11865
21.31%
0.00%
f01924824
Seoul, Seoul, KR
288 GiB
0.14%
0.00%
Not reporting
13095
14.38%
0.00%
f01924891
Seoul, Seoul, KR
288 GiB
0.14%
0.00%
Not reporting
12787
17.86%
0.00%
f01926635
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
32 GiB
0.02%
0.00%
OK
149569
53.07%
0.00%
f01927163
Seoul, Seoul, KR
320 GiB
0.16%
0.00%
Not reporting
12467
25.74%
0.00%
f01982557
Seoul, Seoul, KR
128 GiB
0.06%
0.00%
Not reporting
604
0.00%
0.00%
f01987994
Seoul, Seoul, KR
512 GiB
0.26%
0.00%
Not reporting
649
12.66%
0.00%
f02011071
San Francisco, California, US
67.13 TiB
34.34%
2.00%
Not reporting
3281
0.00%
0.00%
f02259776
Klang, Selangor, MY
96 GiB
0.05%
0.00%
Not reporting
1077
66.48%
0.00%
f02639429
Sugar Land, Texas, US
78 TiB
39.90%
2.28%
Not reporting
5554
27.49%
0.00%
f02822919
Palmerston North, Manawatu-Wanganui, NZ
32 GiB
0.02%
0.00%
OK
1224
79.30%
0.00%
f02860778
Seoul, Seoul, KR
96 GiB
0.05%
0.00%
Not reporting
1119
0.00%
0.00%
f02860783
Seoul, Seoul, KR
128 GiB
0.06%
0.00%
Not reporting
726
0.00%
0.00%
f02941916
Seoul, Seoul, KR
160 GiB
0.08%
0.00%
Not reporting
544
0.00%
0.00%
f02943119
Chinch'ŏn, North Chungcheong, KR
192 GiB
0.10%
0.00%
Not reporting
1297
0.00%
0.00%
f03134685
Incheon, Incheon, KR
864 GiB
0.43%
0.00%
Not reporting
16245
53.13%
0.00%
f03277453
Petaling Jaya, Selangor, MY
64 GiB
0.03%
0.00%
OK
22132
2.81%
0.00%
f03383926
Seoul, Seoul, KR
384 GiB
0.19%
0.00%
Not reporting
80
0.00%
0.00%
f03468521
Lelystad, Flevoland, NL
44.25 TiB
22.63%
0.00%
OK
2788
0.00%
0.00%
f03493414
Lelystad, Flevoland, NL
704 GiB
0.35%
0.00%
OK
2092
0.00%
0.00%
f0717969
Huntington Park, California, US
64 GiB
0.03%
0.00%
Not reporting
35641
0.00%
0.00%
f0763337
San Diego, California, US
256 GiB
0.13%
0.00%
Not reporting
7471
3.89%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
2 issues
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
23.88 TiB
24.88 TiB
12.72%
2
35.31 TiB
71.56 TiB
36.6%
3
31.72 TiB
96.34 TiB
49.28%
4
352 GiB
1.38 TiB
0.7%
5
160 GiB
800 GiB
0.39%
6
96 GiB
576 GiB
0.28%
91.5 TiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
f01131298
96 GiB
2
f02208630
3.25 TiB
103