DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 178846

Client ID: f03089810

Report Detail
Report 178846 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

5.18 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
6 issues
Number of providers: 9

f0172300

Shanghai, Shanghai, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

43.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.11%

Deal Percentage

0.8% / 352 GiB

Duplication

1380

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01782100

Shanghai, Shanghai, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

46.78 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.46%

Deal Percentage

0.07% / 32 GiB

Duplication

3907

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01999672

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

291.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

27.76%

Deal Percentage

10.27% / 29.91 TiB

Duplication

19769

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02948413

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

72.78 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.94%

Deal Percentage

0.82% / 608 GiB

Duplication

103633

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03074163

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

96.38 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.19%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

27729

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03074583

Tokyo, Tokyo, JP

Sample Piece URL not found

125 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.92%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

75026

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03074586

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

125 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.92%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

74995

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03074587

Seoul, Seoul, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

125 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.92%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

75017

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03074589

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

123.69 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.79%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

75455

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
3
51.97 TiB
156.63 TiB
14.93%
4
102.66 TiB
410.63 TiB
39.14%
2
81.13 TiB
162.5 TiB
15.49%
1
289.22 TiB
319.13 TiB
30.42%
524.97 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.