f0172300
Nanjing, Jiangsu, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
43.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.11%
Deal Percentage
0.8% / 352 GiB
Duplication
1380
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
5.18 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Nanjing, Jiangsu, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
43.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.11%
Deal Percentage
0.8% / 352 GiB
Duplication
1380
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Nanjing, Jiangsu, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
46.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.46%
Deal Percentage
0.07% / 32 GiB
Duplication
3907
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
291.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
27.76%
Deal Percentage
10.27% / 29.91 TiB
Duplication
19769
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
72.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.94%
Deal Percentage
0.82% / 608 GiB
Duplication
103633
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
96.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.19%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
27729
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
125 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.92%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75026
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
125 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.92%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74995
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
125 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.92%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75017
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
123.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.79%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75455
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 51.97 TiB | 156.63 TiB | 14.93% |
| 4 | 102.66 TiB | 410.63 TiB | 39.14% |
| 2 | 81.13 TiB | 162.5 TiB | 15.49% |
| 1 | 289.22 TiB | 319.13 TiB | 30.42% |
| 524.97 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||