f010479
Paris, Île-de-France, FR
Sample Piece URL not found
2.15 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.25%
Deal Percentage
4.54% / 100 GiB
Duplication
2448
Total Claims
6%
RPA
6%
Consistent RPA
94%
Inconsistent RPA
10311 ms
Time to First Byte
82.09 Mbps
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
1.95 day
Client is receiving DataCap from multiple allocators.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Paris, Île-de-France, FR
Sample Piece URL not found
2.15 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.25%
Deal Percentage
4.54% / 100 GiB
Duplication
2448
Total Claims
6%
RPA
6%
Consistent RPA
94%
Inconsistent RPA
10311 ms
Time to First Byte
82.09 Mbps
Bandwidth
Kraków, Lesser Poland, PL
Sample Piece URL not found
4.11 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.39%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
3562
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Lelystad, Flevoland, NL
Sample Piece URL not found
64 GiB
Total Deal Size
0.04%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
5069
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Juan Capistrano, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
280 GiB
Total Deal Size
0.16%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
240
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Lelystad, Flevoland, NL
Sample Piece URL not found
16.52 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.61%
Deal Percentage
8.71% / 1.44 TiB
Duplication
3337
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Detroit, Michigan, US
Sample Piece URL not found
7.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.35%
Deal Percentage
0.42% / 32 GiB
Duplication
1919
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Kraków, Lesser Poland, PL
Sample Piece URL not found
4.15 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.41%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
5435
Total Claims
70%
RPA
70%
Consistent RPA
30%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Austin, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
13.2 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.68%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
36944
Total Claims
9%
RPA
9%
Consistent RPA
91%
Inconsistent RPA
10130 ms
Time to First Byte
214.53 Mbps
Bandwidth
Chino Hills, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
8.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.18%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
97495
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10209 ms
Time to First Byte
160.67 Mbps
Bandwidth
Incheon, Incheon, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
34.4 TiB
Total Deal Size
20.01%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
20753
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ashburn, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
1.15 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.67%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
56908
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ashburn, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
6.62 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.85%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
102006
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
43.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
25.11%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 4 GiB
Duplication
23517
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Bourton on the Water, England, GB
Sample Piece URL not found
29.71 TiB
Total Deal Size
17.28%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
17118
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.16 TiB | 64.66 TiB | 37.61% |
| 3 | 18.32 TiB | 55 TiB | 31.99% |
| 2 | 26.1 TiB | 52.23 TiB | 30.38% |
| 107.58 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f02144497 | 3.04 TiB | 100 |