f01081419
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
117.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.21%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
278533
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
8.01 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
117.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.21%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
278533
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Osaka, Osaka, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
169.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.19%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
55492
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
161.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.02%
Deal Percentage
49.84% / 80.25 TiB
Duplication
28370
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN
Sample Piece URL not found
198.33 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.72%
Deal Percentage
49.73% / 98.63 TiB
Duplication
29769
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
99.95 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.88%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
48853
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
197.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.71%
Deal Percentage
49.72% / 98.3 TiB
Duplication
129240
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Piscataway, New Jersey, US
Sample Piece URL not found
99.83 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.87%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
92957
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
294.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.54%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
106159
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
340.42 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.39%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
126908
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
249.2 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.68%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
106783
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dubai, Dubai, AE
Sample Piece URL not found
346.11 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.5%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
126265
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
340.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.4%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
126419
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
227.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.28%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
111216
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Osaka, Osaka, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
229.92 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.32%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
110747
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
150.02 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.82%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
83067
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Bangkok, Bangkok, TH
Sample Piece URL not found
207.27 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.89%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 32 GiB
Duplication
82992
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
295.61 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.55%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
50479
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
251.42 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.72%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
51203
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
394.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.4%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
108784
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Piscataway, New Jersey, US
Sample Piece URL not found
397.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.47%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
109098
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
168.86 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.17%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
86125
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Osaka, Osaka, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
168.48 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.16%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
84805
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
218.45 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.1%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
87778
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 51.56 TiB | 154.69 TiB | 2.9% |
| 2 | 42.56 TiB | 85.13 TiB | 1.59% |
| 1 | 118.88 TiB | 118.88 TiB | 2.23% |
| 6 | 249.53 TiB | 1.69 PiB | 32.4% |
| 4 | 184.45 TiB | 740.06 TiB | 13.89% |
| 5 | 490.92 TiB | 2.44 PiB | 46.96% |
| 1.11 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.