Report 173321

Client ID: f03069956

Report Detail

Report 173321 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

9.27 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

9 issues

Number of providers: 28

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	Total claims	RPA
f01082868	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	428.19 TiB	0.05%	17.49%	46648	N/A
f01083931	Changsha, Hunan, CN	326.94 TiB	0.03%	51.72%	295953	N/A
f01674133	Osaka, Osaka, JP	41.13 TiB	0%	0%	55492	N/A
f02227496	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	101.77 TiB	0.01%	0%	28370	N/A
f02837684	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	149.91 TiB	0.02%	0%	60564	N/A
f02953066	Washington, District of Columbia, US	148.47 TiB	0.02%	0%	60485	N/A
f02956073	Singapore, Singapore, SG	109.86 TiB	0.01%	0%	48853	N/A
f03028412	Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN	99.16 TiB	0.01%	0%	24390	N/A
f03080852	Toronto, Ontario, CA	298.55 TiB	0.03%	0%	129240	N/A
f03080854	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	299.75 TiB	0.03%	0.03%	92957	N/A
f03091738	Dallas, Texas, US	316.58 TiB	0.03%	0%	91347	N/A
f03173124	Seoul, Seoul, KR	496.77 TiB	0.05%	0%	106159	N/A
f03188440	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	334.86 TiB	0.04%	0%	126908	N/A
f03188443	Singapore, Singapore, SG	547.66 TiB	0.06%	0%	106783	N/A
f03190614	Dubai, Dubai, AE	324.92 TiB	0.03%	0%	126265	N/A
f03190616	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	335.25 TiB	0.04%	0%	126419	N/A
f03196399	Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MY	442.47 TiB	0.05%	0%	111216	N/A
f03196401	Osaka, Osaka, JP	448.03 TiB	0.05%	0%	110747	N/A
f03201941	Toronto, Ontario, CA	427.95 TiB	0.05%	0%	83067	N/A
f03228953	Bangkok, Bangkok, TH	427.92 TiB	0.05%	0%	82992	N/A
f03251827	Singapore, Singapore, SG	196.13 TiB	0.02%	0%	50479	N/A
f03251828	Dallas, Texas, US	200 TiB	0.02%	0%	51203	N/A
f03254061	Montréal, Quebec, CA	575.89 TiB	0.06%	0%	108784	N/A
f03254063	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	592.31 TiB	0.06%	0%	109098	N/A
f03254125	Dallas, Texas, US	498.5 TiB	0.05%	0%	86125	N/A
f03259560	Osaka, Osaka, JP	499.94 TiB	0.05%	0%	84805	N/A
f03265465	Manila, National Capital Region, PH	573.78 TiB	0.06%	0%	119516	N/A
f03513103	Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR	205.08 TiB	0.02%	0%	56440	N/A

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

3 issues

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
4	387.36 TiB	1.51 PiB	16.4%
2	263.34 TiB	631.75 TiB	6.68%
1	365.86 TiB	504.8 TiB	5.34%
3	175.42 TiB	526.27 TiB	5.57%
5	1.22 PiB	6.09 PiB	65.99%
	2.38 PiB Total

Wrong provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs
f03070890	33.94 TiB	886
f03071549	34.19 TiB	1092
f03254504	149.53 TiB	1094
f03282090	387.69 TiB	9344
f03493322	167.66 TiB	3307
f03551481	147.97 TiB	3443
f03602023	55.31 TiB	886
f03604159	567.47 TiB	2817