Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

SpaceTelescope Science Institute

Client ID: f03054012

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

4.53 TiB

Allocated DataCap

8 PiB
Report Detail
Report 12954 from 2025-02-12 03:02

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
3 issues
Number of providers: 23
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
f010202
Dallas, Texas, US
297 TiB
3.88%
0.00%
Not reporting
39789
77.91%
0.00%
f02227496
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
138.19 TiB
1.80%
0.00%
Not reporting
15875
40.85%
0.00%
f02815438
Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN
169.09 TiB
2.21%
0.00%
OK
14995
49.12%
0.00%
f02837684
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
149.94 TiB
1.96%
0.00%
Not reporting
60564
77.87%
0.00%
f02953066
Los Angeles, California, US
148.47 TiB
1.94%
0.00%
Not reporting
60485
77.89%
0.00%
f02956073
Singapore, Singapore, SG
49.97 TiB
0.65%
0.00%
Not reporting
48853
78.38%
0.00%
f03028412
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
63.56 TiB
0.83%
0.00%
Not reporting
24390
75.10%
0.00%
f03044609
Paripark, Seoul, KR
9.97 TiB
0.13%
0.00%
OK
635
77.67%
0.00%
f03080852
Toronto, Ontario, CA
248.41 TiB
3.24%
0.00%
Not reporting
92944
0.00%
0.00%
f03080854
Piscataway, New Jersey, US
249.69 TiB
3.26%
0.04%
Not reporting
92957
78.32%
0.00%
f03091738
Dallas, Texas, US
325.94 TiB
4.26%
0.00%
Not reporting
91345
77.77%
0.00%
f03144037
Paripark, Seoul, KR
629.75 TiB
8.22%
0.00%
Not reporting
131157
76.23%
0.00%
f03148356
Ōi, Saitama, JP
350 TiB
4.57%
0.00%
Not reporting
74227
77.99%
0.00%
f03156617
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
350 TiB
4.57%
0.00%
Not reporting
74384
78.56%
0.00%
f03173124
Seoul, Seoul, KR
793.03 TiB
10.36%
0.00%
OK
106159
0.00%
0.00%
f03173127
Dallas, Texas, US
556.09 TiB
7.26%
0.00%
OK
69499
78.32%
0.00%
f03188440
Burnaby, British Columbia, CA
396.19 TiB
5.17%
0.00%
Not reporting
126907
0.00%
0.00%
f03188443
Singapore, Singapore, SG
794.53 TiB
10.38%
0.00%
Not reporting
106783
0.00%
0.00%
f03190614
Dubai, Dubai, AE
397.22 TiB
5.19%
0.00%
OK
126264
0.00%
0.00%
f03190616
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
396.56 TiB
5.18%
0.00%
OK
126419
0.00%
0.00%
f03196399
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MY
445.09 TiB
5.81%
0.00%
OK
111215
0.00%
0.00%
f03196401
Osaka, Osaka, JP
425.97 TiB
5.56%
0.00%
OK
110746
0.00%
0.00%
f03275720
Dallas, Texas, US
271.94 TiB
3.55%
0.00%
OK
91384
34.93%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
2 TiB
2 TiB
0.02%
2
124.41 TiB
248.81 TiB
3.24%
3
129.88 TiB
389.63 TiB
5.08%
4
69.63 TiB
278.5 TiB
3.63%
5
1.11 PiB
5.55 PiB
74.26%
6
175.22 TiB
1.03 PiB
13.73%
1.6 PiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.