f01025366
Qingdao, Shandong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
404 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.9%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
114256
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.15 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Qingdao, Shandong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
404 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.9%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
114256
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Nanjing, Jiangsu, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
75.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.47%
Deal Percentage
0.04% / 32 GiB
Duplication
3907
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
35.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.69%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
18905
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
15.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.29%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
132061
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Nanchang, Jiangxi, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
1.6 PiB
Total Deal Size
32.12%
Deal Percentage
50.06% / 822.09 TiB
Duplication
262530
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
492.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.64%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
68994
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
141.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.77%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
65962
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
739.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.45%
Deal Percentage
49.93% / 369 TiB
Duplication
159304
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Zhengzhou, Henan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
75 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.47%
Deal Percentage
50% / 37.5 TiB
Duplication
25990
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Nanchang, Jiangxi, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
469.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.18%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
32905
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
193.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.78%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 32 GiB
Duplication
27729
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
61.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.21%
Deal Percentage
0.3% / 192 GiB
Duplication
5038
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
403 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.88%
Deal Percentage
50% / 201.5 TiB
Duplication
138296
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
35.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.7%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
42534
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Qingdao, Shandong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
329.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.44%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
94868
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 237.91 TiB | 1.56 PiB | 31.31% |
| 9 | 10.63 TiB | 116.91 TiB | 2.28% |
| 4 | 211.5 TiB | 1.17 PiB | 23.52% |
| 8 | 12.06 TiB | 116.06 TiB | 2.27% |
| 7 | 110.38 TiB | 1.01 PiB | 20.15% |
| 2 | 32.09 TiB | 126.13 TiB | 2.46% |
| 3 | 28.63 TiB | 120.5 TiB | 2.35% |
| 6 | 59.47 TiB | 483.84 TiB | 9.46% |
| 1 | 175.31 TiB | 314.91 TiB | 6.15% |
| 877.97 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||