f01233054
Dallas, Texas, US
1.78 PiB
Total Deal Size
32.58%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
29194
Total Claims
18%
RPA
18%
Consistent RPA
82%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.21 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Dallas, Texas, US
1.78 PiB
Total Deal Size
32.58%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
29194
Total Claims
18%
RPA
18%
Consistent RPA
82%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
114 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.04%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
62455
Total Claims
11%
RPA
11%
Consistent RPA
89%
Inconsistent RPA
10511 ms
Time to First Byte
63.27 Mbps
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
114 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.04%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
76661
Total Claims
5%
RPA
5%
Consistent RPA
95%
Inconsistent RPA
10495 ms
Time to First Byte
55.82 Mbps
Bandwidth
Bạch Mai, Hanoi, VN
1.78 PiB
Total Deal Size
32.58%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
29194
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10493 ms
Time to First Byte
3 Mbps
Bandwidth
Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP
861.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.38%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
77198
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10338 ms
Time to First Byte
4.25 Mbps
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
861.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.39%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
77200
Total Claims
25%
RPA
25%
Consistent RPA
75%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 951.19 TiB | 3.72 PiB | 67.93% |
| 2 | 825.06 TiB | 1.61 PiB | 29.46% |
| 3 | 48.5 TiB | 145.5 TiB | 2.59% |
| 1 | 256 GiB | 256 GiB | 0% |
| 1.78 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||