f01233054
Dallas, Texas, US
1.61 PiB
Total Deal Size
31.74%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
26418
Total Claims
22%
RPA
22%
Consistent RPA
78%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.21 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Dallas, Texas, US
1.61 PiB
Total Deal Size
31.74%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
26418
Total Claims
22%
RPA
22%
Consistent RPA
78%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
114 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.19%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
62455
Total Claims
8%
RPA
8%
Consistent RPA
92%
Inconsistent RPA
10497 ms
Time to First Byte
56.16 Mbps
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
114 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.19%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
76661
Total Claims
7%
RPA
7%
Consistent RPA
93%
Inconsistent RPA
10470 ms
Time to First Byte
75.12 Mbps
Bandwidth
Bạch Mai, Hanoi, VN
1.56 PiB
Total Deal Size
30.75%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
25597
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10493 ms
Time to First Byte
3 Mbps
Bandwidth
Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP
861.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.56%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
77198
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10350 ms
Time to First Byte
3.41 Mbps
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
861.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.56%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
77200
Total Claims
20%
RPA
20%
Consistent RPA
80%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 951.19 TiB | 3.72 PiB | 73.11% |
| 2 | 598.19 TiB | 1.17 PiB | 22.99% |
| 3 | 48.5 TiB | 145.5 TiB | 2.79% |
| 1 | 57 TiB | 57 TiB | 1.09% |
| 1.62 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||