Open
Yes
10
0.38 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
312.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.54%
Deal Percentage
1.09% / 3.41 TiB
Duplication
199768
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10428 ms
Time to First Byte
13.74 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
313.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.57%
Deal Percentage
1.15% / 3.59 TiB
Duplication
200298
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10435 ms
Time to First Byte
24.71 Mbps
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
310.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.47%
Deal Percentage
1.12% / 3.47 TiB
Duplication
180042
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
Sample Piece URL not found
187.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.54%
Deal Percentage
4.19% / 7.88 TiB
Duplication
130961
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
225.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.05%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
133389
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
209.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.41%
Deal Percentage
0.04% / 96 GiB
Duplication
133494
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
307.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.32%
Deal Percentage
2.66% / 8.16 TiB
Duplication
230687
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
10419 ms
Time to First Byte
18.69 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
312.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.55%
Deal Percentage
1.12% / 3.5 TiB
Duplication
200075
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
312.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.55%
Deal Percentage
1.15% / 3.59 TiB
Duplication
197614
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10429 ms
Time to First Byte
26.2 Mbps
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2.31 TiB | 9.25 TiB | 0.37% |
| 5 | 139.16 TiB | 695.91 TiB | 27.93% |
| 2 | 1.38 TiB | 2.75 TiB | 0.11% |
| 3 | 130.44 TiB | 391.34 TiB | 15.7% |
| 6 | 960 GiB | 5.63 TiB | 0.22% |
| 7 | 4.47 TiB | 31.34 TiB | 1.25% |
| 8 | 146.88 TiB | 1.15 PiB | 47.31% |
| 1 | 672 GiB | 672 GiB | 0.02% |
| 9 | 16.22 TiB | 175.78 TiB | 7.05% |
| 442.44 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||