Open
Yes
10
2.33 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
617.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.5%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 96 GiB
Duplication
199768
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10428 ms
Time to First Byte
13.74 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
617.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.5%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 160 GiB
Duplication
200298
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10435 ms
Time to First Byte
24.71 Mbps
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
611.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.38%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 96 GiB
Duplication
180042
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
Sample Piece URL not found
569.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.52%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
130961
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
618.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.53%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
133389
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
620.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.57%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
133494
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
52.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.06%
Deal Percentage
0.06% / 32 GiB
Duplication
82177
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
615.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.47%
Deal Percentage
0.04% / 256 GiB
Duplication
200075
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
616.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.49%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 128 GiB
Duplication
197614
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10429 ms
Time to First Byte
26.2 Mbps
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 53.63 TiB | 375.47 TiB | 7.6% |
| 6 | 6.94 TiB | 41.63 TiB | 0.84% |
| 3 | 50.69 TiB | 152.06 TiB | 3.07% |
| 8 | 518.94 TiB | 4.05 PiB | 84.05% |
| 4 | 1.69 TiB | 6.75 TiB | 0.13% |
| 1 | 416 GiB | 416 GiB | 0% |
| 5 | 40.97 TiB | 204.88 TiB | 4.14% |
| 2 | 3.34 TiB | 6.69 TiB | 0.13% |
| 676.59 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03545682 | 329.41 TiB | 2861 |