DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 198711

Client ID: f03627646

Report Detail
Report 198711 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.36 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
3 issues
Number of providers: 12

f02825281

Ürümqi, Xinjiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

200 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.69%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

98180

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02826762

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

200.28 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.7%

Deal Percentage

0.28% / 576 GiB

Duplication

98731

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02827010

Ürümqi, Xinjiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

200 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.69%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

99190

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02827135

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

200 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.69%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

100129

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03231999

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

654.31 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.09%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

145682

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03232222

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

453.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.37%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

56115

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03340635

Jakarta, Jakarta, ID

Sample Piece URL not found

363.41 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.71%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

106419

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03601967

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE

Sample Piece URL not found

511.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.44%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

136635

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03601993

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE

Sample Piece URL not found

522.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.66%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

138577

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03610683

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

570.41 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.54%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 64 GiB

Duplication

112693

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03623232

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

1.22 PiB

Total Deal Size

23.1%

Deal Percentage

1.34% / 16.78 TiB

Duplication

115966

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f0685706

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

287.75 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.31%

Deal Percentage

0.25% / 736 GiB

Duplication

62089

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
4 issues
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
3
150.06 TiB
450.19 TiB
8.31%
6
1.66 TiB
9.94 TiB
0.18%
8
19.53 TiB
156.31 TiB
2.88%
9
176.56 TiB
1.55 PiB
29.35%
7
2.25 TiB
15.75 TiB
0.29%
1
1.62 PiB
1.63 PiB
30.86%
4
108.63 TiB
434.5 TiB
8.02%
2
384.88 TiB
770.53 TiB
14.23%
5
63.22 TiB
316.09 TiB
5.83%
2.5 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.