f03336023
Jakarta, Jakarta, ID
Sample Piece URL not found
261.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
5%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
78054
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
0.65 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Jakarta, Jakarta, ID
Sample Piece URL not found
261.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
5%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
78054
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Jakarta, Jakarta, ID
Sample Piece URL not found
245.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.7%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
106419
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
258.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.96%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
82555
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
248.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.76%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
82364
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
268 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.13%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
83486
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
540.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.35%
Deal Percentage
14.66% / 79.22 TiB
Duplication
160488
Total Claims
0%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
235.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.52%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
136635
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
242.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.65%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
138577
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
London, England, GB
Sample Piece URL not found
289.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.54%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
80648
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
London, England, GB
Sample Piece URL not found
392.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.52%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
77494
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Virginia Beach, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
387.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.42%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
78841
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Virginia Beach, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
394.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.55%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75920
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
331.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.34%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
77194
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
371.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.12%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
78899
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
754.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.45%
Deal Percentage
14.6% / 110.13 TiB
Duplication
73743
Total Claims
0%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 242.69 TiB | 728.06 TiB | 13.94% |
| 5 | 86.09 TiB | 430.47 TiB | 8.24% |
| 2 | 484.13 TiB | 1.13 PiB | 22.16% |
| 6 | 126.78 TiB | 760.69 TiB | 14.56% |
| 1 | 280.34 TiB | 280.34 TiB | 5.36% |
| 4 | 13.09 TiB | 52.38 TiB | 1% |
| 7 | 113.72 TiB | 796.03 TiB | 15.24% |
| 9 | 51.56 TiB | 464.06 TiB | 8.88% |
| 8 | 69.09 TiB | 552.75 TiB | 10.58% |
| 1.43 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||