DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 195216

Client ID: f03622849

Report Detail
Report 195216 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

2.47 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
5 issues
Number of providers: 9

f01021773

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

95.59 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.76%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

23006

Total Claims

0%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01081419

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

383.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

19.09%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

278533

Total Claims

0%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01083931

Changsha, Hunan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

31.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.59%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

299693

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01084149

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

486.16 TiB

Total Deal Size

24.22%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

278554

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01084949

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

256 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.76%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

279111

Total Claims

0%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01708981

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

288.22 TiB

Total Deal Size

14.36%

Deal Percentage

0.08% / 224 GiB

Duplication

65014

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03126600

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

127.38 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.35%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

15675

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03611998

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

212.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.59%

Deal Percentage

0.38% / 832 GiB

Duplication

149351

Total Claims

0%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03623218

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

126 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.28%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

8719

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
6
48.63 TiB
291.81 TiB
14.53%
2
33.63 TiB
67.25 TiB
3.35%
4
180.09 TiB
720.91 TiB
35.92%
1
9.91 TiB
9.91 TiB
0.49%
7
6.84 TiB
47.91 TiB
2.38%
3
83.28 TiB
250.22 TiB
12.46%
5
123.78 TiB
618.97 TiB
30.84%
486.16 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.