DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 178803

Client ID: f03618570

Report Detail
Report 178803 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.42 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
3 issues
Number of providers: 10

f03081952

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

183.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

16.75%

Deal Percentage

0.1% / 192 GiB

Duplication

163759

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03081960

Los Angeles, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

167.66 TiB

Total Deal Size

15.26%

Deal Percentage

0.06% / 96 GiB

Duplication

65956

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03373733

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

96 GiB

Total Deal Size

0.01%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

303432

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03499888

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

98.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.92%

Deal Percentage

0.03% / 32 GiB

Duplication

220511

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03559991

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

134.38 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.23%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

140961

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03559992

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

115.5 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.51%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

134069

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03559993

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

161.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

14.71%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

131263

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03559994

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

115.53 TiB

Total Deal Size

10.52%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

141959

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03567899

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

61.09 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.56%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

128744

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03577777

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

60.81 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.54%

Deal Percentage

0.1% / 64 GiB

Duplication

127926

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
2
4.06 TiB
8.13 TiB
0.73%
7
38.09 TiB
266.75 TiB
24.28%
5
22.28 TiB
111.5 TiB
10.14%
8
19.91 TiB
159.34 TiB
14.5%
9
18.06 TiB
162.63 TiB
14.8%
4
7.28 TiB
29.13 TiB
2.65%
1
19.31 TiB
19.31 TiB
1.75%
6
51.91 TiB
311.47 TiB
28.35%
3
10.13 TiB
30.38 TiB
2.76%
191.03 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.