f03081952
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
183.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.75%
Deal Percentage
0.1% / 192 GiB
Duplication
163759
Total Claims
99%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.42 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
183.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.75%
Deal Percentage
0.1% / 192 GiB
Duplication
163759
Total Claims
99%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
167.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.26%
Deal Percentage
0.06% / 96 GiB
Duplication
65956
Total Claims
96%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
96 GiB
Total Deal Size
0.01%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
303432
Total Claims
99%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
98.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.92%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 32 GiB
Duplication
220511
Total Claims
98%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
134.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.23%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
140961
Total Claims
96%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
115.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.51%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
134069
Total Claims
79%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
161.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.71%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
131263
Total Claims
99%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
115.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.52%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
141959
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
61.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.56%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
128744
Total Claims
98%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
60.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.54%
Deal Percentage
0.1% / 64 GiB
Duplication
127926
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 4.06 TiB | 8.13 TiB | 0.73% |
| 7 | 38.09 TiB | 266.75 TiB | 24.28% |
| 5 | 22.28 TiB | 111.5 TiB | 10.14% |
| 8 | 19.91 TiB | 159.34 TiB | 14.5% |
| 9 | 18.06 TiB | 162.63 TiB | 14.8% |
| 4 | 7.28 TiB | 29.13 TiB | 2.65% |
| 1 | 19.31 TiB | 19.31 TiB | 1.75% |
| 6 | 51.91 TiB | 311.47 TiB | 28.35% |
| 3 | 10.13 TiB | 30.38 TiB | 2.76% |
| 191.03 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||