f02822088
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
30.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.6%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
161755
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.08 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
30.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.6%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
161755
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
492.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.69%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 96 GiB
Duplication
32764
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
497.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.78%
Deal Percentage
0.06% / 288 GiB
Duplication
164119
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
495.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.75%
Deal Percentage
0.14% / 704 GiB
Duplication
65956
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
478.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.41%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 160 GiB
Duplication
326749
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
497.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.8%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
312740
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
493.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.71%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 64 GiB
Duplication
314580
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Kim Bài, Hanoi, VN
490.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.66%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 96 GiB
Duplication
314642
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
Sample Piece URL not found
31.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.61%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
162003
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Kim Bài, Hanoi, VN
496.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.77%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 128 GiB
Duplication
315820
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
585.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.53%
Deal Percentage
15.62% / 91.5 TiB
Duplication
230687
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
30.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.59%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
140363
Total Claims
0%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
31.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.61%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
140640
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Changchun, Jilin, CN
431 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.48%
Deal Percentage
5.81% / 25.06 TiB
Duplication
66039
Total Claims
87%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 32 GiB | 192 GiB | 0% |
| 8 | 5.41 TiB | 44.19 TiB | 0.86% |
| 10 | 391.31 TiB | 3.9 PiB | 78.65% |
| 11 | 37.56 TiB | 428.69 TiB | 8.43% |
| 9 | 65.41 TiB | 606.09 TiB | 11.92% |
| 1 | 3.47 TiB | 3.47 TiB | 0.06% |
| 7 | 288 GiB | 1.97 TiB | 0.03% |
| 503.47 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||