Allocators

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability
f02822088	Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH	21.22 TiB	1.17%	0.00%	OK	103715	24.61%	0.00%
f03373337	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	304.19 TiB	16.78%	0.04%	OK	79115	0.00%	0.00%
f03373373	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	95.63 TiB	5.28%	0.10%	OK	71861	0.00%	0.00%
f03373733	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	214.88 TiB	11.86%	0.04%	OK	73342	0.00%	0.00%
f03377773	Hanoi, Hanoi, VN	219.56 TiB	12.11%	0.04%	OK	69603	0.00%	0.00%
f03377778	Hanoi, Hanoi, VN	264.72 TiB	14.61%	0.07%	OK	73851	0.00%	0.00%
f03499888	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	245.28 TiB	13.53%	0.00%	OK	76976	4.27%	4.27%
f03499999	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	243.03 TiB	13.41%	0.09%	OK	83843	2.89%	0.00%
f03500000	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	204 TiB	11.26%	0.15%	OK	82573	3.62%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	39.63 TiB	39.63 TiB	2.18%
2	15.94 TiB	31.97 TiB	1.76%
3	7.72 TiB	23.16 TiB	1.27%
4	19.63 TiB	78.53 TiB	4.33%
5	8.5 TiB	42.5 TiB	2.34%
6	18.78 TiB	112.78 TiB	6.22%
7	103.41 TiB	724.09 TiB	39.95%
8	71.63 TiB	573.5 TiB	31.64%
9	20.69 TiB	186.34 TiB	10.28%
	305.91 TiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.