f01111110
Hanoi, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
115.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.91%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
98568
Total Claims
2%
RPA
2%
Consistent RPA
98%
Inconsistent RPA
10505 ms
Time to First Byte
7.82 Mbps
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
5.74 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Hanoi, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
115.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.91%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
98568
Total Claims
2%
RPA
2%
Consistent RPA
98%
Inconsistent RPA
10505 ms
Time to First Byte
7.82 Mbps
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
199.27 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.46%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
106601
Total Claims
6%
RPA
6%
Consistent RPA
94%
Inconsistent RPA
10347 ms
Time to First Byte
3.68 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hanoi, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
110.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.7%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
99886
Total Claims
1%
RPA
1%
Consistent RPA
99%
Inconsistent RPA
10524 ms
Time to First Byte
7.46 Mbps
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
199.27 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.46%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
100108
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10354 ms
Time to First Byte
3.46 Mbps
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
199.27 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.46%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
101790
Total Claims
5%
RPA
5%
Consistent RPA
95%
Inconsistent RPA
10343 ms
Time to First Byte
5.21 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hanoi, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
57.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.44%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
37356
Total Claims
34%
RPA
34%
Consistent RPA
66%
Inconsistent RPA
10469 ms
Time to First Byte
4.58 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hanoi, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
57.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.44%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
40984
Total Claims
61%
RPA
61%
Consistent RPA
39%
Inconsistent RPA
10488 ms
Time to First Byte
6.12 Mbps
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
220.39 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.35%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
157853
Total Claims
51%
RPA
51%
Consistent RPA
49%
Inconsistent RPA
10472 ms
Time to First Byte
72.02 Mbps
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
220.39 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.35%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
145713
Total Claims
35%
RPA
35%
Consistent RPA
65%
Inconsistent RPA
10467 ms
Time to First Byte
69.43 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
484.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
20.58%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
65518
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
491.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
20.86%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
65447
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 39.2 TiB | 196.02 TiB | 8.31% |
| 2 | 555.72 TiB | 1.09 PiB | 47.17% |
| 4 | 62.38 TiB | 249.5 TiB | 10.58% |
| 1 | 47.94 TiB | 47.94 TiB | 2.03% |
| 3 | 83.56 TiB | 250.69 TiB | 10.64% |
| 7 | 71.5 TiB | 500.5 TiB | 21.24% |
| 860.3 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||