f01111110
Bạch Mai, Hanoi, VN
115.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.91%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
98508
Total Claims
53%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
5.74 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Bạch Mai, Hanoi, VN
115.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.91%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
98508
Total Claims
53%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
199.2 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.46%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
106548
Total Claims
12%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Bạch Mai, Hanoi, VN
110.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.7%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
99802
Total Claims
43%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
199.2 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.46%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
99608
Total Claims
1%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
199.27 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.46%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
101317
Total Claims
7%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Bạch Mai, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
57.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.44%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
37237
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Bạch Mai, Hanoi, VN
57.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.44%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
40982
Total Claims
64%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
220.39 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.36%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
153760
Total Claims
93%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
220.39 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.36%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
141320
Total Claims
92%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
484.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
20.57%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
65502
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
491.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
20.85%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
65424
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 39.2 TiB | 196.02 TiB | 8.32% |
| 2 | 555 TiB | 1.08 PiB | 47.13% |
| 4 | 62.38 TiB | 249.5 TiB | 10.59% |
| 1 | 48.78 TiB | 48.78 TiB | 2.07% |
| 3 | 83.44 TiB | 250.31 TiB | 10.62% |
| 7 | 71.5 TiB | 500.5 TiB | 21.25% |
| 860.3 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||