f01111110
Hanoi, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
10 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.2%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
98568
Total Claims
2%
RPA
2%
Consistent RPA
98%
Inconsistent RPA
10470 ms
Time to First Byte
9.03 Mbps
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.72 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Hanoi, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
10 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.2%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
98568
Total Claims
2%
RPA
2%
Consistent RPA
98%
Inconsistent RPA
10470 ms
Time to First Byte
9.03 Mbps
Bandwidth
Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
810 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.82%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
106601
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10347 ms
Time to First Byte
3.68 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hanoi, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
10 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.2%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
99886
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10466 ms
Time to First Byte
6.8 Mbps
Bandwidth
Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
110 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.15%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
100108
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10349 ms
Time to First Byte
3.95 Mbps
Bandwidth
Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
710 TiB
Total Deal Size
13.87%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
101790
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10343 ms
Time to First Byte
5.21 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hanoi, Hanoi, VN
585 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.43%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74120
Total Claims
88%
RPA
88%
Consistent RPA
12%
Inconsistent RPA
10480 ms
Time to First Byte
9.26 Mbps
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
550 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.74%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
157853
Total Claims
40%
RPA
40%
Consistent RPA
60%
Inconsistent RPA
10476 ms
Time to First Byte
63.66 Mbps
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
550 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.74%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
145713
Total Claims
43%
RPA
43%
Consistent RPA
57%
Inconsistent RPA
10474 ms
Time to First Byte
58.92 Mbps
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
600 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.72%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
98657
Total Claims
75%
RPA
75%
Consistent RPA
25%
Inconsistent RPA
10469 ms
Time to First Byte
72.16 Mbps
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
600 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.72%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
98653
Total Claims
71%
RPA
71%
Consistent RPA
29%
Inconsistent RPA
10492 ms
Time to First Byte
74.74 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hanoi, Hanoi, VN
585 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.43%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74208
Total Claims
84%
RPA
84%
Consistent RPA
16%
Inconsistent RPA
10454 ms
Time to First Byte
6.21 Mbps
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 10 TiB | 50 TiB | 0.97% |
| 8 | 450 TiB | 3.52 PiB | 70.31% |
| 2 | 190 TiB | 380 TiB | 7.42% |
| 4 | 85 TiB | 340 TiB | 6.64% |
| 6 | 125 TiB | 750 TiB | 14.64% |
| 860 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||