f01081419
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
564.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.94%
Deal Percentage
88.99% / 502.13 TiB
Duplication
278533
Total Claims
0%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
11.38 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
564.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.94%
Deal Percentage
88.99% / 502.13 TiB
Duplication
278533
Total Claims
0%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Changsha, Hunan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
1.17 PiB
Total Deal Size
16.83%
Deal Percentage
93.11% / 1.09 PiB
Duplication
299693
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
206.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.9%
Deal Percentage
69.91% / 144.25 TiB
Duplication
278554
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
721.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.16%
Deal Percentage
91.4% / 659.56 TiB
Duplication
279111
Total Claims
0%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Osaka, Osaka, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
398.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.61%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
55492
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
499.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.03%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
80370
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
241.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.4%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
50479
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
274.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.87%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
51203
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
249 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.5%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
108784
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Piscataway, New Jersey, US
Sample Piece URL not found
355.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.01%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
109098
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
355.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.01%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
86125
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Osaka, Osaka, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
192.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.72%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
84805
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Manila, National Capital Region, PH
Sample Piece URL not found
692.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.75%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
119516
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
596.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.4%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
87778
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
159.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.24%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
43454
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
399.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.62%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
56440
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 263.97 TiB | 1.03 PiB | 14.86% |
| 2 | 99.53 TiB | 199.06 TiB | 2.8% |
| 3 | 141.34 TiB | 1.69 PiB | 24.34% |
| 6 | 65.88 TiB | 395.25 TiB | 5.56% |
| 7 | 178.88 TiB | 1.22 PiB | 17.62% |
| 5 | 168.03 TiB | 840.22 TiB | 11.82% |
| 1 | 519.25 TiB | 1.59 PiB | 22.97% |
| 1.4 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||