Allocators

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability
f01431043	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	399.78 TiB	17.51%	0.00%	N/A	89.23%	0.00%
f01660795	Jiangmen, Guangdong, CN	152.94 TiB	6.70%	0.00%	N/A	83.47%	0.00%
f02851143	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	165.88 TiB	7.27%	0.00%	N/A	81.18%	0.00%
f03099981	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	220 TiB	9.64%	0.00%	N/A	89.19%	0.00%
f03100004	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	343 TiB	15.03%	0.00%	N/A	54.83%	0.00%
f03216485	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	87.75 TiB	3.84%	0.00%	N/A	66.79%	0.00%
f03231666	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	179.59 TiB	7.87%	0.00%	N/A	77.86%	0.00%
f03241837	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	440.09 TiB	19.28%	0.00%	N/A	59.00%	0.00%
f03251993	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	258.72 TiB	11.33%	0.00%	N/A	85.68%	0.00%
f0671982	Central, Central and Western, HK	35 TiB	1.53%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	80.34 TiB	80.34 TiB	3.51%
2	57.78 TiB	115.56 TiB	5.06%
3	82.13 TiB	246.38 TiB	10.79%
4	42.06 TiB	168.25 TiB	7.37%
5	37.56 TiB	187.81 TiB	8.22%
6	14.88 TiB	89.25 TiB	3.9%
7	13.09 TiB	91.66 TiB	4.01%
8	67.31 TiB	538.5 TiB	23.58%
9	85 TiB	765 TiB	33.51%
	480.16 TiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.