f01999119
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
879.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.28%
Deal Percentage
0.15% / 1.34 TiB
Duplication
45051
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
3.33 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
879.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.28%
Deal Percentage
0.15% / 1.34 TiB
Duplication
45051
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
224.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.14%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75657
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
1.14 PiB
Total Deal Size
16.34%
Deal Percentage
0.25% / 2.97 TiB
Duplication
118967
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
547.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.65%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
67536
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
430.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.01%
Deal Percentage
1.45% / 6.25 TiB
Duplication
126411
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
296.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.15%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
45913
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
561.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.85%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
17980
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
1.45 PiB
Total Deal Size
20.81%
Deal Percentage
0.31% / 4.63 TiB
Duplication
76448
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
621.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.68%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 96 GiB
Duplication
19886
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
112.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.57%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 32 GiB
Duplication
5622
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
475.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.64%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
162144
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
154.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.16%
Deal Percentage
0.04% / 64 GiB
Duplication
18314
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
195.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.74%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
45461
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 390.44 TiB | 1.91 PiB | 27.32% |
| 7 | 171.06 TiB | 1.18 PiB | 16.8% |
| 3 | 160 TiB | 481.59 TiB | 6.72% |
| 6 | 170.75 TiB | 1 PiB | 14.31% |
| 4 | 227.31 TiB | 911.5 TiB | 12.73% |
| 9 | 45.59 TiB | 410.34 TiB | 5.73% |
| 1 | 368.19 TiB | 369.09 TiB | 5.15% |
| 2 | 130.06 TiB | 260.44 TiB | 3.63% |
| 8 | 67.75 TiB | 542.03 TiB | 7.57% |
| 1.69 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||