f01082888
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
99.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.95%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 32 GiB
Duplication
518136
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.21 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
99.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.95%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 32 GiB
Duplication
518136
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
197.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.86%
Deal Percentage
1.58% / 3.13 TiB
Duplication
261713
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
149.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.91%
Deal Percentage
2.01% / 3 TiB
Duplication
257231
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Beijing, Beijing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
222.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.34%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
94523
Total Claims
0%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
London, England, GB
Sample Piece URL not found
719 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.04%
Deal Percentage
0.7% / 5.06 TiB
Duplication
111529
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
302.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.9%
Deal Percentage
1.42% / 4.28 TiB
Duplication
119840
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN
Sample Piece URL not found
629.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.3%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
77110
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Moscow, Moscow, RU
Sample Piece URL not found
604.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.81%
Deal Percentage
0.35% / 2.13 TiB
Duplication
111109
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
513.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.03%
Deal Percentage
0.76% / 3.91 TiB
Duplication
144016
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Changsha, Hunan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
197.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.86%
Deal Percentage
3.59% / 7.09 TiB
Duplication
134916
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
1.45 PiB
Total Deal Size
28.99%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
128316
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 80 TiB | 160.41 TiB | 3.13% |
| 3 | 380.56 TiB | 1.12 PiB | 22.39% |
| 4 | 178.78 TiB | 723.75 TiB | 14.13% |
| 5 | 272.47 TiB | 1.35 PiB | 26.9% |
| 1 | 1.67 PiB | 1.67 PiB | 33.43% |
| 2.56 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||