DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 198000

Client ID: f03245295

Report Detail
Report 198000 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.30 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
6 issues
Number of providers: 20

f01084413

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

179.16 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.56%

Deal Percentage

0.47% / 864 GiB

Duplication

261713

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01084941

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

229.09 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.56%

Deal Percentage

0.87% / 2 TiB

Duplication

257231

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01431043

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

9.47 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.19%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

32765

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01660795

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

196 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.9%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

164687

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01975299

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

88 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.75%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

27472

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02816097

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

495.91 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.86%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

83121

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02826007

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

123.78 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.46%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

86505

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02827996

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

181.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.6%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

111740

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02828242

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

605.75 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.05%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

97015

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02851143

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

141.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.82%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

28229

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03066836

Changsha, Hunan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

118.47 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.36%

Deal Percentage

0.58% / 704 GiB

Duplication

27388

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03099981

Beijing, Beijing, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

248 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.93%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

193151

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100004

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

789 TiB

Total Deal Size

15.69%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

131520

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03156722

Central, Central and Western, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

354.31 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.05%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

113427

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03192503

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

51.5 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.02%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

66866

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03216485

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

86.28 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.72%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

112248

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03228358

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

400.81 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.97%

Deal Percentage

1.25% / 5 TiB

Duplication

119916

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03231666

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

423.41 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.42%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

130167

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03233966

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

80.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.61%

Deal Percentage

2.59% / 2.09 TiB

Duplication

81201

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03242023

Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

225.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.49%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

31605

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
1
281.59 TiB
281.59 TiB
5.59%
14
24.25 TiB
339.63 TiB
6.75%
5
46.19 TiB
233.09 TiB
4.63%
7
12.34 TiB
86.41 TiB
1.71%
13
23.38 TiB
304.03 TiB
6.04%
19
9.22 TiB
175.41 TiB
3.48%
3
103.31 TiB
309.94 TiB
6.16%
2
66.06 TiB
132.13 TiB
2.62%
6
102.22 TiB
615.81 TiB
12.24%
17
29.88 TiB
509.09 TiB
10.12%
10
16.5 TiB
165.13 TiB
3.28%
15
13.84 TiB
207.72 TiB
4.13%
9
11.88 TiB
107.31 TiB
2.13%
4
42.25 TiB
169.06 TiB
3.36%
8
22.59 TiB
181.19 TiB
3.6%
12
14.22 TiB
170.88 TiB
3.39%
11
27.5 TiB
303.25 TiB
6.03%
16
14.25 TiB
228.91 TiB
4.55%
18
28.16 TiB
508 TiB
10.1%
889.63 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.