f01111110
Chờ, Bac Ninh, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
643.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.58%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
98568
Total Claims
1%
RPA
1%
Consistent RPA
99%
Inconsistent RPA
10466 ms
Time to First Byte
6.5 Mbps
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
1.83 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Chờ, Bac Ninh, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
643.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.58%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
98568
Total Claims
1%
RPA
1%
Consistent RPA
99%
Inconsistent RPA
10466 ms
Time to First Byte
6.5 Mbps
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
440 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.6%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
106601
Total Claims
6%
RPA
6%
Consistent RPA
94%
Inconsistent RPA
10350 ms
Time to First Byte
4.18 Mbps
Bandwidth
Chờ, Bac Ninh, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
643.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.58%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
99886
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10465 ms
Time to First Byte
5.19 Mbps
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
440 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.6%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
100108
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10359 ms
Time to First Byte
4.4 Mbps
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
440 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.6%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
101790
Total Claims
7%
RPA
7%
Consistent RPA
93%
Inconsistent RPA
10347 ms
Time to First Byte
3.69 Mbps
Bandwidth
Chờ, Bac Ninh, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
20 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.39%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
29083
Total Claims
56%
RPA
56%
Consistent RPA
44%
Inconsistent RPA
10446 ms
Time to First Byte
6.67 Mbps
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
1.04 PiB
Total Deal Size
20.91%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
157853
Total Claims
41%
RPA
41%
Consistent RPA
59%
Inconsistent RPA
10464 ms
Time to First Byte
47.21 Mbps
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
185 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.62%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
30691
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
185 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.62%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
30628
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
1.03 PiB
Total Deal Size
20.52%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
145713
Total Claims
43%
RPA
43%
Consistent RPA
57%
Inconsistent RPA
10474 ms
Time to First Byte
51.62 Mbps
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 50 TiB | 300 TiB | 5.86% |
| 5 | 20 TiB | 100 TiB | 1.95% |
| 7 | 350 TiB | 2.39 PiB | 47.87% |
| 4 | 188.5 TiB | 754 TiB | 14.73% |
| 2 | 441.5 TiB | 883 TiB | 17.25% |
| 9 | 70 TiB | 630 TiB | 12.31% |
| 1.09 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||