DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 194813

Client ID: f03212865

Report Detail
Report 194813 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

1.53 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
6 issues
Number of providers: 21

f01084413

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

158.19 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.24%

Deal Percentage

0.22% / 352 GiB

Duplication

261713

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01084941

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

60.09 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.23%

Deal Percentage

0.16% / 96 GiB

Duplication

257231

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f0114153

Changsha, Hunan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

216.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.44%

Deal Percentage

0.23% / 512 GiB

Duplication

259986

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01431043

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

256.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.26%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

32765

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01975299

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

203.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.16%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

27472

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02826588

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

119.66 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.45%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

112304

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02851143

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

98.72 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.02%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

28229

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03066836

Changsha, Hunan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

38.16 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.78%

Deal Percentage

0.41% / 160 GiB

Duplication

27388

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100002

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

50.19 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.03%

Deal Percentage

0.37% / 192 GiB

Duplication

291981

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100008

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

229.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.71%

Deal Percentage

0.84% / 1.94 TiB

Duplication

143917

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100009

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

49.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.02%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

302796

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03156722

Central, Central and Western, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

84.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.72%

Deal Percentage

0.07% / 64 GiB

Duplication

113427

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03161261

New York City, New York, US

Sample Piece URL not found

304.25 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.23%

Deal Percentage

1.71% / 5.19 TiB

Duplication

153786

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03189917

Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US

Sample Piece URL not found

343.41 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.04%

Deal Percentage

1.28% / 4.41 TiB

Duplication

93613

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03192503

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

65.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.35%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

66866

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03214920

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

561.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.51%

Deal Percentage

0.8% / 4.47 TiB

Duplication

122404

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03216485

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

49.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.02%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

112248

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03224828

London, England, GB

Sample Piece URL not found

40.81 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.84%

Deal Percentage

2.07% / 864 GiB

Duplication

76582

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03231666

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

667.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

13.67%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

130167

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03241837

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

979.19 TiB

Total Deal Size

20.07%

Deal Percentage

0.87% / 8.56 TiB

Duplication

221695

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03242023

Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

302.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.19%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

31605

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
3 issues
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
17
9.16 TiB
156.31 TiB
3.2%
1
582.41 TiB
584.28 TiB
11.97%
4
35.63 TiB
147.25 TiB
3.01%
12
22.03 TiB
266.13 TiB
5.45%
19
34.28 TiB
652.94 TiB
13.37%
8
12.75 TiB
102.44 TiB
2.09%
5
5.09 TiB
26.06 TiB
0.53%
14
9.22 TiB
129.97 TiB
2.66%
13
16.88 TiB
220.53 TiB
4.51%
2
110.81 TiB
222.97 TiB
4.56%
7
27.75 TiB
194.38 TiB
3.98%
9
57.34 TiB
516.84 TiB
10.59%
11
21.19 TiB
234.88 TiB
4.81%
16
960 GiB
15.16 TiB
0.31%
20
2.56 TiB
51.41 TiB
1.05%
10
38 TiB
382.13 TiB
7.83%
15
288 GiB
4.25 TiB
0.08%
3
219.19 TiB
661.19 TiB
13.54%
18
3.19 TiB
57.41 TiB
1.17%
6
41.78 TiB
253.56 TiB
5.19%
1.22 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.