Report 132

Client ID: f03212865

Report Detail

Report 132 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

2 issues

Number of providers: 20

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	Total claims	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f01084413	Singapore, Singapore, SG	157.84 TiB	4.91%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f01084941	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	60 TiB	1.87%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f0114153	Ningbo, Zhejiang, CN	216.38 TiB	6.73%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f01431043	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	63.09 TiB	1.96%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f01975299	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	61.44 TiB	1.91%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f02826588	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	119.66 TiB	3.72%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03066836	Ningbo, Zhejiang, CN	29.31 TiB	0.91%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03100002	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	50 TiB	1.56%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03100008	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	228 TiB	7.09%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03100009	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	49.97 TiB	1.55%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03156722	Harmony Garden, Eastern, HK	83.97 TiB	2.61%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03161261	New York City, New York, US	299.06 TiB	9.30%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03189917	Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US	339 TiB	10.54%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03192503	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	65.84 TiB	2.05%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03214920	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	450.91 TiB	14.02%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03216485	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	49.63 TiB	1.54%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03224828	London, England, GB	39.97 TiB	1.24%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03231666	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	343.59 TiB	10.69%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03241837	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	417.63 TiB	12.99%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%
f03242023	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	89.88 TiB	2.80%	0.00%	N/A	0.00%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	109.31 TiB	109.31 TiB	3.39%
2	105.28 TiB	210.56 TiB	6.54%
3	13.63 TiB	40.88 TiB	1.26%
4	40.03 TiB	160.13 TiB	4.97%
5	66.25 TiB	331.25 TiB	10.28%
6	12.78 TiB	76.69 TiB	2.38%
7	57 TiB	399 TiB	12.39%
8	38.47 TiB	307.75 TiB	9.55%
9	28.78 TiB	259.03 TiB	8.04%
10	13.91 TiB	139.06 TiB	4.31%
11	11.94 TiB	131.31 TiB	4.07%
12	5.56 TiB	66.75 TiB	2.07%
13	8.66 TiB	112.53 TiB	3.49%
14	448 GiB	6.13 TiB	0.19%
15	960 GiB	14.06 TiB	0.43%
16	9.34 TiB	149.5 TiB	4.64%
17	11.75 TiB	199.75 TiB	6.2%
18	25.16 TiB	452.81 TiB	14.06%
19	2.78 TiB	52.84 TiB	1.64%
	562 TiB Total

Wrong provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.