DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 10262

Client ID: f03212865

Report Detail
Report 10262 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
2 issues
Number of providers: 21

f01084413

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

157.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.27%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01084941

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

60 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.24%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f0114153

Changsha, Hunan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

216.38 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.48%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01431043

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

254.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.27%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01975299

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

201.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.17%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02826588

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

119.66 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.48%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02851143

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

98.72 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.04%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03066836

Changsha, Hunan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

37.81 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.78%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100002

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

50 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.04%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100008

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

228 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.72%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100009

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

49.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.03%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03156722

Harmony Garden, Eastern, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

83.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.74%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03161261

New York City, New York, US

Sample Piece URL not found

299.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.19%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03189917

Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US

Sample Piece URL not found

339 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.02%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03192503

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

65.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.36%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03214920

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

553.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.47%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03216485

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

49.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.03%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03224828

London, England, GB

Sample Piece URL not found

39.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.83%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03231666

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

660.75 TiB

Total Deal Size

13.68%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03241837

Shanghai, Shanghai, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

961.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

19.92%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03242023

Shanghai, Shanghai, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

300.25 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.22%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
17
9.06 TiB
154.06 TiB
3.19%
1
580.91 TiB
580.91 TiB
12.02%
4
32.56 TiB
130.25 TiB
2.69%
12
21.5 TiB
258 TiB
5.34%
19
33.28 TiB
632.34 TiB
13.09%
8
12.91 TiB
103.25 TiB
2.13%
5
6.75 TiB
33.75 TiB
0.69%
14
9.22 TiB
129.06 TiB
2.67%
13
16.66 TiB
216.53 TiB
4.48%
2
115.94 TiB
231.88 TiB
4.8%
7
28 TiB
196 TiB
4.05%
9
58.56 TiB
527.06 TiB
10.91%
11
21.38 TiB
235.13 TiB
4.86%
16
960 GiB
15 TiB
0.31%
20
2.47 TiB
49.38 TiB
1.02%
10
36.81 TiB
368.13 TiB
7.62%
15
448 GiB
6.56 TiB
0.13%
3
215.66 TiB
646.97 TiB
13.39%
18
4.22 TiB
75.94 TiB
1.57%
6
39.78 TiB
238.69 TiB
4.94%
1.22 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.