Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

ESGFand Pangeo

Client ID: f03202064

PulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

0 B

Allocated DataCap

2 PiB
Propose a Dashboard
Report Detail
Report 66115 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last month or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
6 issues
Number of providers: 17
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
RPA
f01082888
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
99.5 TiB
4.82%
0.00%
Not reporting
365798
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f01084413
Singapore, Singapore, SG
86.63 TiB
4.20%
0.11%
Not reporting
261686
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f01084941
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
101.44 TiB
4.92%
1.42%
OK
255981
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f0114153
Changsha, Hunan, CN
88.44 TiB
4.29%
0.92%
Not reporting
252351
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f01975299
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
176.94 TiB
8.58%
0.85%
Not reporting
27455
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f02046115
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
66.69 TiB
3.23%
1.03%
Not reporting
26038
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03030649
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, CN
56.72 TiB
2.75%
0.00%
Not reporting
53592
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03099988
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
71.34 TiB
3.46%
0.00%
Yes(14 claims)
80223
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03100000
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
84.63 TiB
4.10%
0.74%
Not reporting
186244
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03100001
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
6.88 TiB
0.33%
0.00%
Not reporting
219676
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03100002
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
86.03 TiB
4.17%
1.16%
Not reporting
277984
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03100003
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
10.56 TiB
0.51%
0.00%
Not reporting
135786
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03100008
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
292.25 TiB
14.17%
1.45%
Yes(22 claims)
143906
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03100009
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
346.44 TiB
16.80%
1.43%
Yes(297 claims)
302729
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03156722
Washington, District of Columbia, US
119.19 TiB
5.78%
0.00%
Yes(22 claims)
111460
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03214920
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
322.22 TiB
15.62%
1.70%
Yes(44 claims)
122398
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03216485
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
46.53 TiB
2.26%
0.00%
Not reporting
112165
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
200.81 TiB
202.53 TiB
9.82%
2
29.38 TiB
59.88 TiB
2.9%
3
167.66 TiB
514.56 TiB
24.94%
4
20.13 TiB
80.56 TiB
3.9%
5
352 GiB
1.72 TiB
0.08%
6
9.88 TiB
59.25 TiB
2.87%
7
2.38 TiB
16.63 TiB
0.8%
8
1.28 TiB
10.25 TiB
0.49%
9
2.19 TiB
19.72 TiB
0.95%
10
12.66 TiB
127.69 TiB
6.19%
11
6.09 TiB
67.28 TiB
3.26%
12
9.94 TiB
120.56 TiB
5.84%
13
12.03 TiB
157.19 TiB
7.62%
14
32.97 TiB
463.69 TiB
22.48%
15
4.28 TiB
64.34 TiB
3.11%
16
6 TiB
96.56 TiB
4.68%
518 TiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.