DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 194127

Client ID: f03202064

Report Detail
Report 194127 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.86 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
6 issues
Number of providers: 17

f01082888

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

99.53 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.83%

Deal Percentage

0.03% / 32 GiB

Duplication

518136

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01084413

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

86.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.2%

Deal Percentage

0.11% / 96 GiB

Duplication

261713

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01084941

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

101.44 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.92%

Deal Percentage

1.42% / 1.44 TiB

Duplication

257231

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f0114153

Changsha, Hunan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

88.44 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.29%

Deal Percentage

0.92% / 832 GiB

Duplication

259986

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01975299

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

176.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.58%

Deal Percentage

0.85% / 1.5 TiB

Duplication

27472

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02046115

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

66.69 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.23%

Deal Percentage

1.03% / 704 GiB

Duplication

26047

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03030649

Shijiazhuang, Hebei, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

56.75 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.75%

Deal Percentage

0.06% / 32 GiB

Duplication

53601

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03099988

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

71.34 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.46%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

80250

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100000

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

84.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.1%

Deal Percentage

0.74% / 640 GiB

Duplication

193715

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100001

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

6.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.33%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

232649

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100002

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

86.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.17%

Deal Percentage

1.16% / 1 TiB

Duplication

291981

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100003

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

10.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.51%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

143355

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100008

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

292.25 TiB

Total Deal Size

14.17%

Deal Percentage

1.45% / 4.25 TiB

Duplication

143917

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100009

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

346.44 TiB

Total Deal Size

16.8%

Deal Percentage

1.43% / 4.94 TiB

Duplication

302796

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03156722

Central, Central and Western, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

119.25 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.78%

Deal Percentage

0.05% / 64 GiB

Duplication

113427

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03214920

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

322.22 TiB

Total Deal Size

15.62%

Deal Percentage

1.7% / 5.47 TiB

Duplication

122404

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03216485

Chengdu, Sichuan, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

46.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.26%

Deal Percentage

0.07% / 32 GiB

Duplication

112248

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
2 issues
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
9
2.19 TiB
19.72 TiB
0.95%
3
167.66 TiB
514.56 TiB
24.94%
12
9.94 TiB
120.56 TiB
5.84%
15
4.28 TiB
64.41 TiB
3.12%
6
9.88 TiB
59.25 TiB
2.87%
5
352 GiB
1.72 TiB
0.08%
11
6.09 TiB
67.28 TiB
3.26%
1
200.81 TiB
202.53 TiB
9.81%
4
20.13 TiB
80.56 TiB
3.9%
2
29.38 TiB
59.88 TiB
2.9%
16
6 TiB
96.56 TiB
4.68%
10
12.66 TiB
127.69 TiB
6.19%
14
32.97 TiB
463.75 TiB
22.48%
7
2.38 TiB
16.63 TiB
0.8%
13
12.03 TiB
157.22 TiB
7.62%
8
1.28 TiB
10.25 TiB
0.49%
518 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.