f01084413
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
281 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.84%
Deal Percentage
1.13% / 3.19 TiB
Duplication
261713
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
6.19 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
281 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.84%
Deal Percentage
1.13% / 3.19 TiB
Duplication
261713
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Changsha, Hunan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
56.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.38%
Deal Percentage
1.33% / 768 GiB
Duplication
259986
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
132.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.23%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
83121
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Beijing, Beijing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
183.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.45%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
193151
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
418.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.18%
Deal Percentage
1.04% / 4.34 TiB
Duplication
302796
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
New York City, New York, US
Sample Piece URL not found
514.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.52%
Deal Percentage
0.51% / 2.63 TiB
Duplication
153786
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
515.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.54%
Deal Percentage
0.64% / 3.31 TiB
Duplication
93613
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
98.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.4%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
66866
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
285.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.95%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
112248
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
367.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.94%
Deal Percentage
0.76% / 2.78 TiB
Duplication
119916
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
215.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.23%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
130167
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
262.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.38%
Deal Percentage
0.91% / 2.38 TiB
Duplication
81201
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
713.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
17.36%
Deal Percentage
0.28% / 2 TiB
Duplication
221695
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
66 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.61%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
31605
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 50.66 TiB | 457.78 TiB | 11.13% |
| 5 | 94.19 TiB | 472.19 TiB | 11.48% |
| 12 | 33.28 TiB | 401.06 TiB | 9.75% |
| 1 | 201.78 TiB | 201.78 TiB | 4.9% |
| 14 | 33.28 TiB | 470.41 TiB | 11.44% |
| 6 | 7.69 TiB | 46.16 TiB | 1.12% |
| 8 | 15 TiB | 120.47 TiB | 2.93% |
| 3 | 99.56 TiB | 301.19 TiB | 7.32% |
| 13 | 31 TiB | 405.34 TiB | 9.86% |
| 7 | 30.72 TiB | 215.38 TiB | 5.23% |
| 4 | 32.06 TiB | 129.56 TiB | 3.15% |
| 10 | 50.25 TiB | 504.91 TiB | 12.28% |
| 11 | 33.97 TiB | 376.31 TiB | 9.15% |
| 2 | 3.97 TiB | 7.97 TiB | 0.19% |
| 717.41 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||