Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

ChildMind Institute

Client ID: f03182553

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

0 B

Allocated DataCap

4.25 PiB
Propose a Dashboard
Report Detail
Report 63418 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last month or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
6 issues
Number of providers: 20
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
RPA
f01084413
Singapore, Singapore, SG
80.19 TiB
1.85%
0.47%
Not reporting
261686
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f01660795
Jiangmen, Guangdong, CN
191.19 TiB
4.40%
0.00%
Yes(87 claims)
144834
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f02816097
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
187.13 TiB
4.31%
0.00%
Yes(44 claims)
83032
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f02825282
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
16.66 TiB
0.38%
0.00%
Not reporting
113322
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f02826007
Singapore, Singapore, SG
127.19 TiB
2.93%
0.00%
Yes(11 claims)
86190
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f02826588
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
80.56 TiB
1.85%
0.00%
Yes(33 claims)
112020
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f02827996
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
177.41 TiB
4.08%
0.00%
Yes(29 claims)
111359
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03030649
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, CN
14.66 TiB
0.34%
0.21%
Not reporting
53592
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03100004
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
318.09 TiB
7.32%
0.00%
Yes(22 claims)
131432
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03100008
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
440.78 TiB
10.14%
0.48%
Yes(22 claims)
143906
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03100009
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
343.75 TiB
7.91%
1.11%
Yes(297 claims)
302729
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03156722
Washington, District of Columbia, US
49.97 TiB
1.15%
0.00%
Yes(22 claims)
111460
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03157879
Los Angeles, California, US
256.97 TiB
5.91%
0.39%
Not reporting
141188
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03159626
Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US
255.41 TiB
5.88%
0.02%
Not reporting
168407
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03161261
New York City, New York, US
127 TiB
2.92%
0.81%
Not reporting
152140
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03189917
Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US
230.81 TiB
5.31%
0.35%
Not reporting
93556
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03216485
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
132.06 TiB
3.04%
0.00%
Not reporting
112165
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03224828
London, England, GB
313.31 TiB
7.21%
0.79%
Yes(11 claims)
76529
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03231666
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
278.44 TiB
6.41%
0.00%
Yes(306 claims)
130050
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03241837
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
724.31 TiB
16.67%
0.00%
Yes(126 claims)
221695
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
295.56 TiB
295.56 TiB
6.8%
2
94.53 TiB
189.13 TiB
4.35%
3
22.59 TiB
67.84 TiB
1.56%
4
7.69 TiB
30.81 TiB
0.7%
5
32.16 TiB
162.63 TiB
3.74%
6
22.56 TiB
136.78 TiB
3.14%
7
2.09 TiB
14.75 TiB
0.33%
8
26.38 TiB
211.78 TiB
4.87%
9
36.78 TiB
331.84 TiB
7.63%
10
3.91 TiB
39.09 TiB
0.89%
11
12.06 TiB
132.94 TiB
3.05%
12
43.69 TiB
524.41 TiB
12.06%
13
3.78 TiB
49.22 TiB
1.13%
14
5.09 TiB
71.47 TiB
1.64%
15
36.16 TiB
543.34 TiB
12.5%
16
10.03 TiB
160.97 TiB
3.7%
17
32.97 TiB
563.13 TiB
12.95%
18
26.34 TiB
475.22 TiB
10.93%
19
3.91 TiB
74.31 TiB
1.7%
20
13.5 TiB
270.66 TiB
6.22%
731.78 TiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.