f01084413
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
80.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.84%
Deal Percentage
0.47% / 384 GiB
Duplication
261713
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
2.73 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
80.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.84%
Deal Percentage
0.47% / 384 GiB
Duplication
261713
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
191.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.4%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
164687
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
187.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.31%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
83121
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
16.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.38%
Deal Percentage
0.37% / 64 GiB
Duplication
114051
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
127.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.93%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
86505
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
80.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.86%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
112304
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
177.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.08%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
111740
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
14.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.34%
Deal Percentage
0.21% / 32 GiB
Duplication
53601
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
318.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.32%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
131520
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
440.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.14%
Deal Percentage
0.48% / 2.09 TiB
Duplication
143917
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
343.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.91%
Deal Percentage
1.11% / 3.81 TiB
Duplication
302796
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Central, Central and Western, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
50 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.15%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
113427
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
256.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.91%
Deal Percentage
0.39% / 1 TiB
Duplication
143532
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
255.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.87%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 64 GiB
Duplication
170580
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
New York City, New York, US
Sample Piece URL not found
127 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.92%
Deal Percentage
0.81% / 1.03 TiB
Duplication
153786
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
230.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.31%
Deal Percentage
0.35% / 832 GiB
Duplication
93613
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
132.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.05%
Deal Percentage
0.35% / 480 GiB
Duplication
112248
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
London, England, GB
Sample Piece URL not found
313.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.21%
Deal Percentage
0.79% / 2.47 TiB
Duplication
76582
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
278.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.41%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
130167
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
724.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
16.66%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
221695
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 36.78 TiB | 331.84 TiB | 7.63% |
| 7 | 2.09 TiB | 14.75 TiB | 0.33% |
| 5 | 32.16 TiB | 162.63 TiB | 3.74% |
| 12 | 43.63 TiB | 523.66 TiB | 12.04% |
| 4 | 7.69 TiB | 30.81 TiB | 0.7% |
| 13 | 3.84 TiB | 50.03 TiB | 1.15% |
| 20 | 13.5 TiB | 270.72 TiB | 6.22% |
| 18 | 26.94 TiB | 485.97 TiB | 11.17% |
| 2 | 94.53 TiB | 189.13 TiB | 4.34% |
| 10 | 3.91 TiB | 39.09 TiB | 0.89% |
| 19 | 3.91 TiB | 74.31 TiB | 1.7% |
| 3 | 22.59 TiB | 67.84 TiB | 1.56% |
| 11 | 12.06 TiB | 132.94 TiB | 3.05% |
| 1 | 295.56 TiB | 295.56 TiB | 6.79% |
| 14 | 4.91 TiB | 68.84 TiB | 1.58% |
| 15 | 36.28 TiB | 545.56 TiB | 12.54% |
| 16 | 9.47 TiB | 152.09 TiB | 3.49% |
| 17 | 33 TiB | 563.59 TiB | 12.96% |
| 8 | 26.38 TiB | 211.78 TiB | 4.87% |
| 6 | 22.56 TiB | 136.78 TiB | 3.14% |
| 731.78 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||