f01926635
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
199.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.56%
Deal Percentage
49.81% / 99.22 TiB
Duplication
206382
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
2.42 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
199.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.56%
Deal Percentage
49.81% / 99.22 TiB
Duplication
206382
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
29.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.12%
Deal Percentage
0.21% / 64 GiB
Duplication
45051
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Central, Central and Western, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
37.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.44%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
34257
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
255.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.69%
Deal Percentage
27.48% / 70.13 TiB
Duplication
114051
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
241.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.16%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
86505
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
168.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.4%
Deal Percentage
18.14% / 30.56 TiB
Duplication
120650
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
404.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.37%
Deal Percentage
3.05% / 12.34 TiB
Duplication
112304
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
126.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.81%
Deal Percentage
0.1% / 128 GiB
Duplication
123876
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
82.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.15%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
109452
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
129.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.9%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
112266
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
316.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.01%
Deal Percentage
0.22% / 704 GiB
Duplication
111740
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
256.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.75%
Deal Percentage
27.88% / 71.59 TiB
Duplication
117716
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
130 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.94%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
215446
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Changsha, Hunan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
255.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.7%
Deal Percentage
16.9% / 43.19 TiB
Duplication
134916
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 6.94 TiB | 49.72 TiB | 1.88% |
| 3 | 210.13 TiB | 630.44 TiB | 23.93% |
| 1 | 128 GiB | 128 GiB | 0% |
| 5 | 28.44 TiB | 149.59 TiB | 5.68% |
| 10 | 41.25 TiB | 529 TiB | 20.08% |
| 2 | 9.88 TiB | 19.75 TiB | 0.74% |
| 9 | 40.13 TiB | 448.69 TiB | 17.03% |
| 11 | 20.97 TiB | 256.44 TiB | 9.73% |
| 4 | 28 TiB | 115.69 TiB | 4.39% |
| 8 | 26.94 TiB | 261.97 TiB | 9.94% |
| 7 | 19.97 TiB | 172.13 TiB | 6.53% |
| 432.75 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||