Allocators

Ecosystem

Filecoin

Fil+

Documentation

ESGFand Pangeo

Client ID: f03144081

GitHubView application on GitHub PulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

0 B

Allocated DataCap

4.6 PiB

Report Detail

Report 68522 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last month or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

7 issues

Number of providers: 24

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f01082888	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	66.69 TiB	1.40%	0.00%	Not reporting	365798	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01084413	Singapore, Singapore, SG	157.88 TiB	3.30%	0.34%	Not reporting	261686	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01084941	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	648.56 TiB	13.57%	0.88%	OK	255981	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f0114153	Changsha, Hunan, CN	268.03 TiB	5.61%	1.39%	Not reporting	252351	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01660795	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	31.75 TiB	0.66%	0.00%	Yes(87 claims)	144834	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01975299	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	201.44 TiB	4.21%	0.71%	Not reporting	27455	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02825282	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	109.06 TiB	2.28%	0.00%	Not reporting	113322	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02826588	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	39.28 TiB	0.82%	0.00%	Yes(33 claims)	112020	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02826815	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	73.06 TiB	1.53%	0.00%	Not reporting	116516	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02827996	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	14.59 TiB	0.31%	0.00%	Yes(29 claims)	111359	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02828269	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	88.28 TiB	1.85%	0.00%	Not reporting	113584	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03030649	Shijiazhuang, Hebei, CN	101.97 TiB	2.13%	0.00%	Not reporting	53592	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03089826	Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US	70 TiB	1.46%	50.00%	Not reporting	168312	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03100008	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	703.13 TiB	14.71%	0.80%	Yes(22 claims)	143906	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03100009	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	624.84 TiB	13.07%	0.60%	Yes(297 claims)	302729	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03106356	Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US	70 TiB	1.46%	50.00%	Not reporting	97323	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03144188	Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US	53.34 TiB	1.12%	0.00%	Not reporting	155945	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03145504	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	70.84 TiB	1.48%	0.00%	Not reporting	64944	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03156722	Washington, District of Columbia, US	201.41 TiB	4.21%	0.00%	Yes(22 claims)	111460	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03157879	Los Angeles, California, US	256 TiB	5.36%	0.00%	Not reporting	141188	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03159626	Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US	232.53 TiB	4.86%	0.00%	Not reporting	168407	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03192503	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	318.28 TiB	6.66%	0.37%	Not reporting	66808	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03214920	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	298.81 TiB	6.25%	0.82%	Yes(44 claims)	122398	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03216485	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	80 TiB	1.67%	0.00%	Not reporting	112165	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

1 issue

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	251.91 TiB	253.34 TiB	5.3%
2	27.41 TiB	54.81 TiB	1.14%
3	298.19 TiB	901.69 TiB	18.86%
4	22.31 TiB	90.78 TiB	1.89%
5	32.59 TiB	164.72 TiB	3.44%
6	9.75 TiB	58.97 TiB	1.23%
7	23.47 TiB	164.69 TiB	3.44%
8	32.41 TiB	260.84 TiB	5.45%
9	45.28 TiB	410.78 TiB	8.59%
10	44.66 TiB	449.5 TiB	9.4%
11	4.41 TiB	48.66 TiB	1.01%
12	7.47 TiB	90.06 TiB	1.88%
13	17.22 TiB	224.22 TiB	4.69%
14	2.16 TiB	30.19 TiB	0.63%
15	8.13 TiB	121.97 TiB	2.55%
16	4.81 TiB	77.03 TiB	1.61%
17	16.13 TiB	274.84 TiB	5.75%
18	8.63 TiB	155.69 TiB	3.25%
19	5.78 TiB	110.28 TiB	2.3%
20	1.69 TiB	36.25 TiB	0.75%
21	12.75 TiB	293.53 TiB	6.14%
22	17.47 TiB	420.03 TiB	8.78%
23	3.47 TiB	86.91 TiB	1.81%
	898.06 TiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.

Propose a Dashboard

Report Detail

Report 68522 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last month or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

7 issues

Number of providers: 24

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f01082888	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	66.69 TiB	1.40%	0.00%	Not reporting	365798	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01084413	Singapore, Singapore, SG	157.88 TiB	3.30%	0.34%	Not reporting	261686	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01084941	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	648.56 TiB	13.57%	0.88%	OK	255981	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f0114153	Changsha, Hunan, CN	268.03 TiB	5.61%	1.39%	Not reporting	252351	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01660795	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	31.75 TiB	0.66%	0.00%	Yes(87 claims)	144834	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01975299	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	201.44 TiB	4.21%	0.71%	Not reporting	27455	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02825282	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	109.06 TiB	2.28%	0.00%	Not reporting	113322	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02826588	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	39.28 TiB	0.82%	0.00%	Yes(33 claims)	112020	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02826815	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	73.06 TiB	1.53%	0.00%	Not reporting	116516	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02827996	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	14.59 TiB	0.31%	0.00%	Yes(29 claims)	111359	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02828269	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	88.28 TiB	1.85%	0.00%	Not reporting	113584	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03030649	Shijiazhuang, Hebei, CN	101.97 TiB	2.13%	0.00%	Not reporting	53592	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03089826	Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US	70 TiB	1.46%	50.00%	Not reporting	168312	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03100008	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	703.13 TiB	14.71%	0.80%	Yes(22 claims)	143906	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03100009	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	624.84 TiB	13.07%	0.60%	Yes(297 claims)	302729	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03106356	Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US	70 TiB	1.46%	50.00%	Not reporting	97323	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03144188	Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US	53.34 TiB	1.12%	0.00%	Not reporting	155945	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03145504	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	70.84 TiB	1.48%	0.00%	Not reporting	64944	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03156722	Washington, District of Columbia, US	201.41 TiB	4.21%	0.00%	Yes(22 claims)	111460	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03157879	Los Angeles, California, US	256 TiB	5.36%	0.00%	Not reporting	141188	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03159626	Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US	232.53 TiB	4.86%	0.00%	Not reporting	168407	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03192503	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	318.28 TiB	6.66%	0.37%	Not reporting	66808	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03214920	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	298.81 TiB	6.25%	0.82%	Yes(44 claims)	122398	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03216485	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	80 TiB	1.67%	0.00%	Not reporting	112165	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

1 issue

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	251.91 TiB	253.34 TiB	5.3%
2	27.41 TiB	54.81 TiB	1.14%
3	298.19 TiB	901.69 TiB	18.86%
4	22.31 TiB	90.78 TiB	1.89%
5	32.59 TiB	164.72 TiB	3.44%
6	9.75 TiB	58.97 TiB	1.23%
7	23.47 TiB	164.69 TiB	3.44%
8	32.41 TiB	260.84 TiB	5.45%
9	45.28 TiB	410.78 TiB	8.59%
10	44.66 TiB	449.5 TiB	9.4%
11	4.41 TiB	48.66 TiB	1.01%
12	7.47 TiB	90.06 TiB	1.88%
13	17.22 TiB	224.22 TiB	4.69%
14	2.16 TiB	30.19 TiB	0.63%
15	8.13 TiB	121.97 TiB	2.55%
16	4.81 TiB	77.03 TiB	1.61%
17	16.13 TiB	274.84 TiB	5.75%
18	8.63 TiB	155.69 TiB	3.25%
19	5.78 TiB	110.28 TiB	2.3%
20	1.69 TiB	36.25 TiB	0.75%
21	12.75 TiB	293.53 TiB	6.14%
22	17.47 TiB	420.03 TiB	8.78%
23	3.47 TiB	86.91 TiB	1.81%
	898.06 TiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.