Allocators

Ecosystem

Filecoin

Fil+

Documentation

ESGFand Pangeo

Client ID: f03144081

GitHubView application on GitHub PulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

0 B

Allocated DataCap

4.6 PiB

Report Detail

Report 35302 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

4 issues

Number of providers: 24

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f01082888	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	66.69 TiB	1.42%	0.00%	Not reporting	339311	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01084413	Singapore, Singapore, SG	157.34 TiB	3.36%	0.00%	Not reporting	259022	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01084941	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	642.88 TiB	13.72%	0.00%	OK	254225	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f0114153	Changsha, Hunan, CN	264.31 TiB	5.64%	0.00%	Not reporting	233623	2.94%	0.00%	0.00%
f01660795	Jiangmen, Guangdong, CN	31.75 TiB	0.68%	0.00%	Yes(87 claims)	144395	26.33%	0.00%	0.00%
f01975299	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	200 TiB	4.27%	0.00%	Not reporting	27255	64.70%	0.00%	0.00%
f02825282	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	109.06 TiB	2.33%	0.00%	Not reporting	113240	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02826588	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	39.25 TiB	0.84%	0.00%	Yes(33 claims)	111421	19.80%	0.00%	0.00%
f02826815	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	73.06 TiB	1.56%	0.00%	Not reporting	116516	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02827996	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	14.59 TiB	0.31%	0.00%	Yes(29 claims)	110749	24.57%	0.00%	0.00%
f02828269	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	88.28 TiB	1.88%	0.00%	Not reporting	113584	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03030649	Shijiazhuang, Hebei, CN	101.97 TiB	2.18%	0.00%	Not reporting	53512	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03089826	Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US	35 TiB	0.75%	0.00%	Not reporting	115728	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03100008	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	697.5 TiB	14.88%	0.00%	Yes(22 claims)	142956	57.05%	0.00%	0.00%
f03100009	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	621.13 TiB	13.25%	0.00%	Yes(297 claims)	300399	42.31%	0.00%	0.00%
f03106356	Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US	35 TiB	0.75%	0.00%	Not reporting	59495	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03144188	Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US	53.34 TiB	1.14%	0.00%	Not reporting	155945	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03145504	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	70.84 TiB	1.51%	0.00%	Not reporting	64944	28.83%	0.00%	0.00%
f03156722	Harmony Garden, Eastern, HK	201.31 TiB	4.30%	0.00%	Yes(22 claims)	111020	58.24%	0.00%	0.00%
f03157879	Los Angeles, California, US	256 TiB	5.46%	0.00%	Not reporting	134852	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03159626	Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US	232.53 TiB	4.96%	0.00%	Not reporting	160478	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03192503	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	318.28 TiB	6.79%	0.37%	Not reporting	66439	61.56%	0.00%	0.00%
f03214920	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	296.38 TiB	6.32%	0.00%	Yes(44 claims)	121040	58.14%	0.00%	0.00%
f03216485	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	80 TiB	1.71%	0.00%	Not reporting	111343	13.11%	0.00%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

1 issue

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	251.91 TiB	251.91 TiB	5.37%
2	27.41 TiB	54.81 TiB	1.16%
3	298.19 TiB	894.59 TiB	19.08%
4	22.31 TiB	90.25 TiB	1.92%
5	32.59 TiB	163.13 TiB	3.48%
6	9.75 TiB	58.5 TiB	1.24%
7	23.47 TiB	164.28 TiB	3.5%
8	32.5 TiB	260 TiB	5.54%
9	45.19 TiB	406.69 TiB	8.67%
10	44.66 TiB	446.56 TiB	9.52%
11	4.41 TiB	48.47 TiB	1.03%
12	7.47 TiB	89.63 TiB	1.91%
13	17.22 TiB	223.84 TiB	4.77%
14	2.16 TiB	30.19 TiB	0.64%
15	8.13 TiB	121.88 TiB	2.6%
16	4.81 TiB	77 TiB	1.64%
17	16.13 TiB	274.13 TiB	5.84%
18	8.66 TiB	155.81 TiB	3.32%
19	5.75 TiB	109.25 TiB	2.33%
20	1.69 TiB	33.75 TiB	0.72%
21	12.75 TiB	267.75 TiB	5.71%
22	17.47 TiB	384.31 TiB	8.2%
23	3.47 TiB	79.78 TiB	1.7%
	898.06 TiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.

Propose a Dashboard

Report Detail

Report 35302 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

4 issues

Number of providers: 24

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f01082888	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	66.69 TiB	1.42%	0.00%	Not reporting	339311	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01084413	Singapore, Singapore, SG	157.34 TiB	3.36%	0.00%	Not reporting	259022	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01084941	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	642.88 TiB	13.72%	0.00%	OK	254225	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f0114153	Changsha, Hunan, CN	264.31 TiB	5.64%	0.00%	Not reporting	233623	2.94%	0.00%	0.00%
f01660795	Jiangmen, Guangdong, CN	31.75 TiB	0.68%	0.00%	Yes(87 claims)	144395	26.33%	0.00%	0.00%
f01975299	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	200 TiB	4.27%	0.00%	Not reporting	27255	64.70%	0.00%	0.00%
f02825282	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	109.06 TiB	2.33%	0.00%	Not reporting	113240	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02826588	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	39.25 TiB	0.84%	0.00%	Yes(33 claims)	111421	19.80%	0.00%	0.00%
f02826815	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	73.06 TiB	1.56%	0.00%	Not reporting	116516	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02827996	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	14.59 TiB	0.31%	0.00%	Yes(29 claims)	110749	24.57%	0.00%	0.00%
f02828269	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	88.28 TiB	1.88%	0.00%	Not reporting	113584	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03030649	Shijiazhuang, Hebei, CN	101.97 TiB	2.18%	0.00%	Not reporting	53512	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03089826	Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US	35 TiB	0.75%	0.00%	Not reporting	115728	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03100008	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	697.5 TiB	14.88%	0.00%	Yes(22 claims)	142956	57.05%	0.00%	0.00%
f03100009	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	621.13 TiB	13.25%	0.00%	Yes(297 claims)	300399	42.31%	0.00%	0.00%
f03106356	Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US	35 TiB	0.75%	0.00%	Not reporting	59495	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03144188	Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US	53.34 TiB	1.14%	0.00%	Not reporting	155945	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03145504	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	70.84 TiB	1.51%	0.00%	Not reporting	64944	28.83%	0.00%	0.00%
f03156722	Harmony Garden, Eastern, HK	201.31 TiB	4.30%	0.00%	Yes(22 claims)	111020	58.24%	0.00%	0.00%
f03157879	Los Angeles, California, US	256 TiB	5.46%	0.00%	Not reporting	134852	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03159626	Dulles Town Center, Virginia, US	232.53 TiB	4.96%	0.00%	Not reporting	160478	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03192503	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	318.28 TiB	6.79%	0.37%	Not reporting	66439	61.56%	0.00%	0.00%
f03214920	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	296.38 TiB	6.32%	0.00%	Yes(44 claims)	121040	58.14%	0.00%	0.00%
f03216485	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	80 TiB	1.71%	0.00%	Not reporting	111343	13.11%	0.00%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

1 issue

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	251.91 TiB	251.91 TiB	5.37%
2	27.41 TiB	54.81 TiB	1.16%
3	298.19 TiB	894.59 TiB	19.08%
4	22.31 TiB	90.25 TiB	1.92%
5	32.59 TiB	163.13 TiB	3.48%
6	9.75 TiB	58.5 TiB	1.24%
7	23.47 TiB	164.28 TiB	3.5%
8	32.5 TiB	260 TiB	5.54%
9	45.19 TiB	406.69 TiB	8.67%
10	44.66 TiB	446.56 TiB	9.52%
11	4.41 TiB	48.47 TiB	1.03%
12	7.47 TiB	89.63 TiB	1.91%
13	17.22 TiB	223.84 TiB	4.77%
14	2.16 TiB	30.19 TiB	0.64%
15	8.13 TiB	121.88 TiB	2.6%
16	4.81 TiB	77 TiB	1.64%
17	16.13 TiB	274.13 TiB	5.84%
18	8.66 TiB	155.81 TiB	3.32%
19	5.75 TiB	109.25 TiB	2.33%
20	1.69 TiB	33.75 TiB	0.72%
21	12.75 TiB	267.75 TiB	5.71%
22	17.47 TiB	384.31 TiB	8.2%
23	3.47 TiB	79.78 TiB	1.7%
	898.06 TiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.