f01926635
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
451.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
23.93%
Deal Percentage
49.02% / 221.16 TiB
Duplication
206382
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
1.83 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
451.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
23.93%
Deal Percentage
49.02% / 221.16 TiB
Duplication
206382
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
31.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.65%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
34647
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
20 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.06%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
21649
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
137.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.3%
Deal Percentage
12.22% / 16.81 TiB
Duplication
104300
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
299.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
15.89%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
182184
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
24.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.31%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
115972
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
197.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.49%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 64 GiB
Duplication
67891
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
395.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
21%
Deal Percentage
49.94% / 197.69 TiB
Duplication
95723
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
327.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
17.37%
Deal Percentage
11.09% / 36.31 TiB
Duplication
33782
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.94 TiB | 54.75 TiB | 2.9% |
| 4 | 43.94 TiB | 237.16 TiB | 12.58% |
| 7 | 29.94 TiB | 272.28 TiB | 14.44% |
| 2 | 31.84 TiB | 73.81 TiB | 3.91% |
| 6 | 85.25 TiB | 695.59 TiB | 36.9% |
| 3 | 31.5 TiB | 119.25 TiB | 6.32% |
| 5 | 57.91 TiB | 397.59 TiB | 21.09% |
| 8 | 3.44 TiB | 34.56 TiB | 1.83% |
| 324.75 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03045819 | 24.75 TiB | 792 |